Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27947

in Jarvisburg, North CarolinaPopulation 1,028

52.62/ 100

Ranked #12,602 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #282 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #69 of 123 Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

60.4%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

19.8 mi

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

14.6 mi

in the top 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

17.8 mi

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

93%

in the top 11.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

12.3%

in the bottom 12.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

9.1 mi

in the top 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

42.9 mi

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

7.6%

in the top 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US76th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Jarvisburg, North Carolina (ZIP 27947), overall, ranks in the top 39% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,602nd) and the top 36% of North Carolina (282nd).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Unemployment stands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 8.3% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Homeownership resides in the top 11.8% nationally, and housing-cost burden settles in the bottom 12.9% nationally. Set against that, floodplain exposure is in the top 2.5% nationally, and distance to an emergency room sits in the top 5.6% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands in the top 9.7% nationally, and distance to a nursing home lies in the top 13.1% nationally.

Defined simply, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 27927, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.0%24.4–31.7
High blood pressure among adults35.5%31.1–40.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.6–9.5
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.1–8.5
Depression among adults25.6%21.7–29.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%9.6–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.2%31.6–40.8
Obesity among adults35.7%27.3–44.5
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.8%12.0–18.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.9%7.2–10.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.9%73.4–79.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%75.7–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.2–89.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.2%63.1–73.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.4%58.6–66.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.4%67.2–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.2–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.0%11.4–16.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.6%18.3–27.5
Short sleep duration among adults32.8%26.2–39.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.7%15.0–20.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.5–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.0–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%12.5–16.7
Any disability among adults31.2%26.5–36.3
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.5–8.4
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.7–8.9
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.4–15.9
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.9%17.4–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%9.7–14.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.7–11.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.3–11.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.0–8.2
Loneliness among adults30.5%25.4–36.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.6–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6413.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)4.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle5.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription81.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate93.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population11.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households48.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+7.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age46.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$78,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$312,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 1.2478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.24 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured