Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27921

in Camden, North CarolinaPopulation 5,063

55.95/ 100

Ranked #8,327 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #189 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #38 of 123 Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

21.5 mi

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

4.2%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Camden, North Carolina (ZIP 27921) sits in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,327th) and the top 24% of North Carolina (189th).

continue reading

Reading across the measures, this area's clearest strengths come through: modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 4.2% nationally, arsenic registers in the bottom 12.0% nationally, and radon lands in the bottom 12.4% nationally. Poverty resides in the bottom 16% nationally, civic lies in the top 17% nationally, and households without a vehicle settles in the bottom 17% nationally. By contrast, distance to an emergency room stands in the top 4.6% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure is in the top 8.6% nationally. Floodplain exposure rests in the top 11.0% nationally, and walkability sits in the bottom 14.6% nationally.

In plain language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. ZIP 27958, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.6%27.4–31.8
High blood pressure among adults37.4%34.9–39.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.5–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.9%10.0–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%6.1–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Depression among adults24.6%22.4–26.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%10.4–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%35.1–40.0
Obesity among adults35.9%31.9–39.9
Stroke among adults3.5%3.3–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.5%9.2–14.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.9%6.6–9.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%76.0–79.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%78.8–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults89.2%88.0–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.6%63.4–73.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.6%60.8–68.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.2%71.6–85.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%13.8–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.5%11.7–15.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.9%19.4–24.6
Short sleep duration among adults33.4%26.6–40.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.3%15.4–19.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.8–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.5–13.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.4–15.3
Any disability among adults30.7%28.0–33.6
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.8–8.2
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Mobility disability among adults13.7%12.2–15.1
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.2%19.0–23.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.6–12.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.2–10.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.4–10.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Loneliness among adults30.6%27.8–33.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.6–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–646.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle0.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription93.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate73.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households52.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+18.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age40.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$94,473$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$341,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$1,241$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.0 yr ± 1.5078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.50 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured