Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11729

in Deer Park, New YorkPopulation 27,231

64.39/ 100

Ranked #2,255 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 7.1%)

Ranked #308 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #449 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$136,939

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.7%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

130 intersections/sq mi

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.1%

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Park land

13.3%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.9%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Deer Park, New York (ZIP 11729) sits in the top 7.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,255th) and the top 18% of New York (308th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: floodplain exposure is at the national minimum, household income lies in the top 5.7% nationally, and fiber broadband registers in the top 5.5% nationally. Walkability is in the top 7.0% nationally, and modeled hearing disability lies in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Park land is in the top 9.7% nationally. Pulling the other way, PFOA in drinking water lies at the national maximum, and PFOS in drinking water registers at the national maximum. PFAS in drinking water is at the national maximum.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 11746, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.8%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.1%21.0–25.2
High blood pressure among adults31.5%28.9–34.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.3–8.7
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.9–5.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.5–5.6
Depression among adults15.4%13.5–17.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%36.1–41.8
Obesity among adults29.2%25.7–32.7
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.3%7.7–11.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.6–7.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.1%74.5–79.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.8%79.5–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults90.7%89.5–91.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.7%63.5–70.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.0%64.5–69.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%74.7–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%13.8–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.4%8.1–10.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.2%21.5–26.8
Short sleep duration among adults39.6%36.4–43.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.2%13.6–16.9
Frequent mental distress among adults14.4%12.9–15.9
Frequent physical distress among adults11.6%10.3–12.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.9%9.7–12.1
Any disability among adults25.4%22.8–27.9
Hearing disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.6
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.4–13.0
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.2%22.3–28.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.2–14.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.2–10.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.3–13.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.9–7.5
Loneliness among adults30.3%26.8–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–644.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)7.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription89.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate83.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population22.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households47.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+14.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age38.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$136,939$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$539,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,928$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.3 yr ± 0.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.60 years of 80.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured