Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11704

in West Babylon, New YorkPopulation 40,706

61.32/ 100

Ranked #3,931 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.3%)

Ranked #506 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #583 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

140 intersections/sq mi

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

95.2%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$129,195

in the top 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

95.2%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

96.5%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.5 mi

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST13th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.3%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

West Babylon, New York (ZIP 11704), by its composite score, sits in the top 12.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,931st) and the top 29% of New York (506th).

continue reading

The standout strengths in the data are the natural place to begin: walkability rests in the top 6.2% nationally, and household income resides in the top 7.2% nationally. Fiber broadband is in the top 8.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 9.0% nationally. On the other side, PFOA in drinking water registers in the top 6.3% nationally, PFOS in drinking water settles in the top 6.5% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lies in the top 13.1% nationally, and housing-cost burden rests in the top 13.2% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 11702, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 79.9 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $129,195 predicts 81.1 years — 1.2 years below.

    Ranked #1,565 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 79.9 ± 1.1 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.7 years — 1.8 years below them.

    Ranked #1,514 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.9%21.8–26.1
High blood pressure among adults31.7%29.2–34.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.5–9.0
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.6–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
Depression among adults16.5%14.5–18.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.7–11.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.6%35.8–41.5
Obesity among adults30.5%27.0–34.2
Stroke among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.3%9.4–13.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%6.1–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.7%74.1–79.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%79.0–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults90.4%89.2–91.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.8%63.6–70.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.3%61.8–67.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.6%75.1–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.5–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.2%8.9–11.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.6%22.0–27.5
Short sleep duration among adults40.3%37.1–43.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.0%14.3–17.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.8–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.9–13.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.7%10.5–13.1
Any disability among adults26.6%24.0–29.4
Hearing disability among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Independent living disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Mobility disability among adults12.3%10.9–13.7
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.9%22.0–27.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.8–15.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.3%9.0–11.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.9–14.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Loneliness among adults30.6%27.1–34.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.9–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–647.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)9.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle5.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription92.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate74.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population14.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households51.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+16.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age40.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$129,195$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$527,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$2,182$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 0.5778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.57 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured