Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11753

in Jericho, New YorkPopulation 12,435

72.71/ 100

Ranked #203 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.7%)

Ranked #42 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 2.5%)

Ranked #85 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 10.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$175,781

in the top 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

21.8%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

7.2%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.5%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.5%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

4.6%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.3%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

12.0%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Jericho, New York (ZIP 11753) lands in the top 0.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (203rd) and the top 2.5% of New York (42nd).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: household income settles in the top 1.9% nationally, and modeled obesity lies in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability resides in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and utility shutoff lands in the bottom 1.6% nationally. Floodplain exposure registers at the national minimum, modeled transportation sits in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and modeled independent living disability rests in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Fiber broadband is in the top 6.1% nationally, and modeled fair or poor health stands in the bottom 3.4% nationally. Against that, PFAS in drinking water settles at the national maximum.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 11791, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.05%

8%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 32.8; chronic-disease standing 92.0 (top 10%) — 59 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,329 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.6%19.6–23.7
High blood pressure among adults30.6%28.0–33.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.7–9.2
Current asthma among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.5–5.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.0%3.4–4.7
Depression among adults11.1%9.6–12.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.8–11.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.9%38.9–44.8
Obesity among adults21.8%18.9–24.9
Stroke among adults2.6%2.3–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.5%4.5–6.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.6%2.9–4.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.9%79.5–84.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.6%81.4–85.5
Cholesterol screening among adults92.6%91.5–93.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.5%64.1–70.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.3%68.6–73.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.3%70.9–81.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%10.6–14.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.8%5.6–8.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.4%18.6–24.1
Short sleep duration among adults39.3%35.7–42.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.0%10.4–13.8
Frequent mental distress among adults10.6%9.4–11.8
Frequent physical distress among adults9.6%8.4–10.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults7.2%6.3–8.2
Any disability among adults19.7%17.4–22.1
Hearing disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Independent living disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.3
Mobility disability among adults9.1%7.8–10.5
Self-care disability among adults2.2%1.9–2.5
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.1%22.2–28.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.0–10.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.1–6.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.8–8.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Loneliness among adults30.1%26.8–33.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.5%3.0–4.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–645.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)74.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)4.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle6.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription97.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)43.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate84.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population39.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households45.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+20.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age43.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$175,781$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$979,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$2,574$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.9 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 82.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured