Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11703

in North Babylon, New YorkPopulation 17,187

63.09/ 100

Ranked #2,916 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.1%)

Ranked #383 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #512 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$137,158

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

97.7%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

150 intersections/sq mi

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

97.7%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.1%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.42 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.2%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.1%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Park land

12.2%

in the top 10.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.3%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST77th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, North Babylon, New York (ZIP 11703) ranks in the top 9.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,916th) and the top 22% of New York (383rd).

continue reading

A number of signals point in a favorable direction for this area: household income registers in the top 5.6% nationally, and walkability sits in the top 5.2% nationally. Fiber broadband rests in the top 6.5% nationally, and pharmacy is in the top 7.4% nationally. Modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 8.1% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Poverty lies in the bottom 9.9% nationally, and park land resides in the top 10.3% nationally. Working the other way, PFOA in drinking water lands in the top 5.1% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water registers in the top 5.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 11729, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.9%21.8–26.2
High blood pressure among adults31.5%28.9–34.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.6–9.1
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.5–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%4.9–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.4%4.7–6.1
Depression among adults16.5%14.5–18.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%36.4–42.0
Obesity among adults30.2%26.7–33.9
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.2%8.5–12.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.6–7.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.7%74.0–79.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.6%79.2–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults90.7%89.4–91.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.1%65.0–71.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.6%65.1–70.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.3%76.0–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.5%14.4–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.0%8.7–11.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.0%21.2–26.8
Short sleep duration among adults39.1%35.9–42.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.4%13.7–17.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.9%13.4–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.0%10.7–13.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.3%10.0–12.6
Any disability among adults25.8%23.2–28.5
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Mobility disability among adults11.9%10.5–13.3
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.1%21.2–27.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.6%10.9–14.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.2–11.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.1–13.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.5
Loneliness among adults29.8%26.3–33.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.6–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–644.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)8.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)4.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription92.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate86.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population15.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households51.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+16.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age42.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$137,158$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$521,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,971$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 0.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.79 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured