Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11791

in Syosset, New YorkPopulation 25,520

72.83/ 100

Ranked #184 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.6%)

Ranked #37 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 2.2%)

Ranked #76 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 9.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$202,962

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

7.2%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.4%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.1%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.1%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

4.4%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.4%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.2%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

11.0%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Syosset, New York (ZIP 11791), by its overall standing, sits in the top 0.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (184th) and the top 2.2% of New York (37th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: household income sits in the top 1.1% nationally, modeled cognitive disability settles in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Modeled obesity stands in the bottom 3.1% nationally, transportation lands in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and independent living disability is in the bottom 0.8% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity resides in the bottom 4.0% nationally, and food insecurity rests in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health lies in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and recreation sits in the top 4.8% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 11804, about 2.1 miles away. Looking wider, the ZIP also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 99%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 84.5 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $202,962 predicts 82.9 years — 1.7 years above.

    Ranked #1,156 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 27.6; chronic-disease standing 93.1 (top 10%) — 66 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,969 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.4%19.4–23.5
High blood pressure among adults29.4%26.9–31.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.9–9.4
Current asthma among adults8.6%7.7–9.6
Coronary heart disease among adults4.7%4.3–5.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.8%3.3–4.2
Depression among adults12.3%10.7–14.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.5%37.7–43.4
Obesity among adults23.1%20.2–26.2
Stroke among adults2.4%2.2–2.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.8%4.7–7.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.3%2.7–3.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.8%78.3–83.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.1%80.9–85.1
Cholesterol screening among adults92.7%91.7–93.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.3%64.8–71.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.6%70.0–74.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.3%69.7–80.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%12.3–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.5%5.5–7.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.1%16.8–21.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.8%35.2–42.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.0%9.6–12.4
Frequent mental distress among adults11.1%9.9–12.3
Frequent physical distress among adults9.3%8.3–10.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults7.2%6.4–8.1
Any disability among adults18.9%16.7–21.0
Hearing disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.4
Independent living disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Mobility disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.5
Self-care disability among adults2.1%1.9–2.3
Vision disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%20.3–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.9–8.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.6–5.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.4–7.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Loneliness among adults29.3%25.8–32.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.4%2.9–3.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–642.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)4.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)70.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription97.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate93.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population24.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households41.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+15.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age43.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$202,962$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$937,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$3,019$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.5 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 84.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured