Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05774

in Wells, VermontPopulation 1,102

53.45/ 100

Ranked #11,436 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #176 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Recreation access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.4%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

71.4%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST48th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.17%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US77th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Wells, Vermont (ZIP 05774) sits in the top 36% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,436th) and the bottom 29% of Vermont (176th).

continue reading

What works most in this area's favor shows up clearly across the measures: recreation resides in the top 3.2% nationally. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover settles in the top 8.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise is in the bottom 9.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise rests at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep sits in the bottom 11.0% nationally, and homeownership registers in the top 11.0% nationally. Crowded housing lands at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Working the other way, modeled energy burden resides in the top 6.0% nationally.

In plain language, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. ZIP 05764, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.2%30.3–36.3
High blood pressure among adults37.7%34.5–41.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.2%10.2–12.3
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.6–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.9%6.7–9.2
Depression among adults24.8%22.0–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.1–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.9%31.8–38.4
Obesity among adults35.8%31.1–40.8
Stroke among adults3.9%3.4–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.5%12.0–17.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%4.7–7.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.9%77.1–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%75.9–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.4–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.2%64.2–72.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.6%64.5–70.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.3%69.3–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.3–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%10.8–15.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.7%18.3–25.3
Short sleep duration among adults30.3%26.4–34.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.4%14.0–19.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%14.0–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%12.7–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%11.0–14.4
Any disability among adults30.2%26.5–33.9
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.2–8.2
Mobility disability among adults13.4%11.4–15.5
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–649.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)5.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)5.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription88.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate93.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population3.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households71.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+29.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age53.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$76,667$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$253,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$1,200$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.0 yr ± 1.4278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.42 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured