Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05142

in Cavendish, VermontPopulation 564

55.33/ 100

Ranked #9,056 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #134 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

85.1%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

14.4%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.5%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

13.5%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

71.4%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US21st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 41% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US59th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Cavendish, Vermont (ZIP 05142) lands in the top 28% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,056th) and the bottom 46% of Vermont (134th).

continue reading

A number of measures place this area on solid footing: modeled tree cover stands in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the bottom 9.7% nationally. Crowded housing sits at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat is in the bottom 14.7% nationally, obesity settles in the bottom 16% nationally, and disaster risk resides in the bottom 15% nationally. Modeled tooth loss registers in the bottom 12.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden rests in the bottom 17% nationally. By contrast, modeled energy burden stands in the top 11.0% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 05062, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.1%30.1–36.3
High blood pressure among adults36.5%33.1–40.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.2%11.0–13.4
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.1–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.5–9.2
Depression among adults26.5%23.5–29.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.3–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.8%32.4–39.2
Obesity among adults29.5%25.2–34.3
Stroke among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.9%6.3–9.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.3–6.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.9%78.1–83.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.7%73.6–79.6
Cholesterol screening among adults89.8%88.2–91.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.3%65.2–73.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.8%63.4–70.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.4%64.4–77.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.4–15.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.1%9.8–14.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.1%17.5–25.1
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%28.0–36.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.6%13.2–18.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%12.8–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.4%11.6–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.9%10.2–13.8
Any disability among adults27.8%24.2–31.9
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.0–10.5
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.0–8.3
Mobility disability among adults12.9%10.8–15.2
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.7–5.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–644.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)6.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle2.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription91.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate85.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population3.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households61.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+33.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age46.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$83,833$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$292,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.6 yr ± 1.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.92 years of 82.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured