Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05762

in Pittsfield, VermontPopulation 387

62.40/ 100

Ranked #3,290 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.3%)

Ranked #38 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

90.4%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Park land

58.3%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.6%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.4%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

11.1 days/year

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.2%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.4%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.7%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.7%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.8%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

Pittsfield, Vermont (ZIP 05762), in overall standing, comes out in the top 10.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,290th) and the top 15% of Vermont (38th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled tree cover resides in the top 1.2% nationally, park land sits in the top 1.8% nationally, and modeled short sleep stands in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Fiber broadband resides in the top 5.9% nationally, modeled humid heat sits in the bottom 8.2% nationally, and modeled fair or poor health stands in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled independent living disability sits in the bottom 6.8% nationally, and cognitive disability stands in the bottom 8.4% nationally. On the other hand, crowded housing resides in the top 9.7% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 05091, about 7.4 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.2%27.0–33.4
High blood pressure among adults34.1%30.5–37.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.9%9.8–12.0
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.2–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%4.6–7.6
Depression among adults24.1%21.1–27.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.8%7.3–10.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.4%30.3–36.8
Obesity among adults33.5%28.6–38.6
Stroke among adults3.1%2.6–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.6%6.9–10.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.9%3.5–6.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%75.8–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%76.0–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%87.2–90.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.9%62.8–71.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.2%69.4–75.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.5%75.5–85.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.2–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.1%7.4–13.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.7%14.0–21.8
Short sleep duration among adults28.6%24.9–32.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.2%10.5–16.3
Frequent mental distress among adults14.3%12.2–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.2–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.7%8.7–12.9
Any disability among adults25.4%21.3–29.9
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.4–8.6
Independent living disability among adults5.7%4.6–7.0
Mobility disability among adults10.5%8.3–13.0
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.2–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.3%2.7–4.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)0.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)44.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)1.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle3.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription88.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate75.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population4.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households44.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+29.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age53.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$65,739$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$310,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$1,035$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.5 yr ± 1.1178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.11 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured