Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05738

in Cuttingsville, VermontPopulation 1,295

60.70/ 100

Ranked #4,316 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.5%)

Ranked #51 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.88 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

82.9%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST79th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.2%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.5%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

10.3 days/year

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

95.5%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.9%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.0%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Cuttingsville, Vermont (ZIP 05738), overall, ranks in the top 13.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,316th) and the top 20% of Vermont (51st).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: grocery lies in the top 0.5% nationally, recreation stands in the top 2.3% nationally, and modeled tree cover rests in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled short sleep registers in the bottom 3.6% nationally, colon screening resides in the top 3.8% nationally, and humid heat settles in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Homeownership is in the top 8.0% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the bottom 10.5% nationally, and cognitive disability lies in the bottom 9.5% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, grocery runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. ZIP 05062, about 5.8 miles away, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.7%29.6–36.0
High blood pressure among adults36.8%33.3–40.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.9%10.8–13.2
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.3–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%5.5–8.4
Depression among adults23.8%20.8–26.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.3–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.8%31.6–38.3
Obesity among adults33.9%29.0–39.0
Stroke among adults3.6%3.1–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.1%5.7–8.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.0%3.6–6.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%77.7–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%77.2–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults89.4%87.6–91.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.5%70.9–78.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.9%68.0–73.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.0%73.5–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%13.2–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.4%7.9–13.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.1%15.6–23.3
Short sleep duration among adults28.2%24.4–32.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.2%11.8–17.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.2%12.4–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.2–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.9%9.2–13.0
Any disability among adults27.7%23.8–31.9
Hearing disability among adults8.7%7.6–9.9
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.2–7.4
Mobility disability among adults12.0%9.9–14.6
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.6–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.1–4.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–643.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)6.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle0.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription95.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate95.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population3.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households61.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+20.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age43.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$95,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$331,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$1,438$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.5 yr ± 1.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.72 years of 83.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured