Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05761

in Pawlet, VermontPopulation 1,081

52.14/ 100

Ranked #13,265 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #208 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Civic-institution access

0.88 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.2%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

69.2%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST44th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

79.2%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

13.8%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

72.1%

in the bottom 25% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US25th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 41% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US59th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

Pawlet, Vermont (ZIP 05761), by its composite score, sits in the top 41% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,265th) and the bottom 16% of Vermont (208th).

continue reading

Where the data is kindest to this area, a few readings lead the way: civic sits in the top 5.2% nationally, and modeled tree cover lies in the top 9.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep is in the bottom 14.5% nationally. Crowded housing lands at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled energy burden stands in the top 7.6% nationally, distance to an emergency room registers in the top 13.0% nationally, and walkability settles in the bottom 14.8% nationally. Home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 15% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 05251, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.2%30.6–36.0
High blood pressure among adults37.6%34.7–40.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%10.2–12.0
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.8–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%7.0–9.2
Depression among adults25.8%23.1–28.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%9.4–12.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.6%31.7–37.6
Obesity among adults35.5%31.1–40.0
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.8%10.7–15.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.2–7.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%77.0–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.8%76.2–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%86.1–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.1%62.5–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.5%61.6–67.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.1%66.2–77.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%13.2–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%11.2–15.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.4%19.3–25.8
Short sleep duration among adults31.0%27.4–35.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.1%14.9–19.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.3–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%13.1–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.4–14.6
Any disability among adults30.7%27.4–34.1
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.0
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.6
Mobility disability among adults13.9%12.1–15.8
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–647.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)3.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription79.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate90.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population4.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households60.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+31.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age52.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$68,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$324,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$1,431$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.3 yr ± 2.3278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.32 years of 84.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured