Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05777

in West Rutland, VermontPopulation 3,229

53.52/ 100

Ranked #11,342 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #173 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.32 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

76.9%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST59th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.3%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

33%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

30 mi

in the top 28% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, West Rutland, Vermont (ZIP 05777) lands in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,342nd) and the bottom 31% of Vermont (173rd).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: fatal road crashes resides at the national minimum, grocery settles in the top 3.3% nationally, and modeled tree cover is in the top 6.1% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 10.5% nationally, and high cholesterol lies in the bottom 9.4% nationally. Transit stands in the top 13.9% nationally, and modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 16% nationally. Modeled humid heat registers in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other side, modeled energy burden resides in the top 6.8% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. On the overall standing, ZIP 05735, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%28.3–33.9
High blood pressure among adults35.3%32.1–38.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.2–11.2
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.7–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.6–8.8
Depression among adults25.8%22.8–29.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.4–11.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.0%29.9–36.2
Obesity among adults35.7%31.0–40.8
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.5%9.4–14.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.1–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.4–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.4%74.4–80.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.3–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.1%63.2–71.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.6%63.6–69.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.6%69.9–81.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.5%14.1–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%11.0–15.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.8%18.4–25.4
Short sleep duration among adults30.2%26.3–34.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.4%14.0–18.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.8–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.5–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.7–15.3
Any disability among adults29.9%26.4–33.6
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.3
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.4–8.5
Mobility disability among adults12.9%11.1–14.9
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–647.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)4.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription91.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate85.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households61.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+25.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age48.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$64,044$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$214,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$910$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.0 yr ± 1.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.56 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured