Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05743

in Fair Haven, VermontPopulation 4,160

49.63/ 100

Ranked #16,754 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #229 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (bottom 8.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.24 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.5%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.95 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST76th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

80 units

in the top 20% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US80th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

0.75%

in the top 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US73rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 41% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US59th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20.3 per million

in the bottom 44% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US44th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Fair Haven, Vermont (ZIP 05743) sits in the bottom 48% nationally (16,754th) and the bottom 8.1% of Vermont (229th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: grocery lies in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Recreation is in the top 9.8% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol lies in the bottom 11.0% nationally. Modeled tree cover registers in the top 16% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled energy burden is in the top 5.2% nationally, and housing-cost burden lies in the top 13.6% nationally. Distance to an emergency room registers in the top 15% nationally, and home broadband subscription is in the bottom 17% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lies in the top 18% nationally.

Put plainly, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 05732, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.1%29.4–35.1
High blood pressure among adults36.5%33.4–39.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.2–11.0
Current asthma among adults12.5%11.2–14.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.6–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.5–9.7
Depression among adults26.6%23.7–30.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%9.2–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.4%30.2–36.8
Obesity among adults37.3%32.5–42.5
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.6%10.4–15.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.6–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.3–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.3%74.2–80.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.3%83.2–87.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.4%59.2–67.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.0%58.7–65.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.7%68.8–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.8–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.9%12.8–17.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.5%20.3–27.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.1%28.1–36.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.2%15.9–20.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.9–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.7–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.7%13.0–16.7
Any disability among adults32.1%28.8–35.8
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.9–9.8
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.5
Mobility disability among adults14.2%12.4–16.1
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–646.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)5.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)1.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle1.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription80.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate82.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households58.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+20.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age41.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$68,409$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$196,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$931$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 1.2078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.20 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured