Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12804

in Queensbury, New YorkPopulation 28,208

62.41/ 100

Ranked #3,286 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.3%)

Ranked #427 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #3 of 41 Glens Falls, NY ZIPs (top 7.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.7%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

285 units

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.6 mi

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST13th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.7%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST81st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.6%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Queensbury, New York (ZIP 12804) sits in the top 10.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,286th) and the top 25% of New York (427th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that most flatter this area set the tone for the rest: elder services stands in the top 8.1% nationally, modeled colon screening resides in the top 5.5% nationally, and dental providers sits in the top 8.5% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 8.7% nationally. Modeled extreme heat resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled mammography sits in the top 7.8% nationally. Distance to a community health center stands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Against that, modeled disaster risk resides in the top 3.4% nationally, and expected annual loss sits in the top 7.8% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the bottom 9.3% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 12831, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 79%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.4 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $89,127 predicts 79.6 years — 1.8 years above.

    Ranked #1,095 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.1%26.1–32.1
High blood pressure among adults34.1%30.6–37.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.7–11.6
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Depression among adults20.7%17.8–23.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%8.9–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%33.7–41.4
Obesity among adults29.7%24.3–35.3
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.5%7.7–11.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.6%3.9–5.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%76.9–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.1%79.2–84.7
Cholesterol screening among adults90.8%89.7–92.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.7%69.4–77.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.9%66.6–72.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.7%74.2–85.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%13.1–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.0%9.4–12.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.5%18.3–25.0
Short sleep duration among adults32.2%27.2–37.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.5%13.6–17.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.9%13.2–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.4–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.1%9.8–12.4
Any disability among adults25.9%22.7–29.3
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Independent living disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Mobility disability among adults12.5%11.0–14.2
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.0%18.0–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.0–11.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.0–9.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.3–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Loneliness among adults29.6%25.3–34.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.5–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–643.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)5.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)42.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)5.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle6.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription92.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate75.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population2.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households59.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+25.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age47.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$89,127$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$311,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,246$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.4 yr ± 0.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 81.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured