Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03835

in Farmington, New HampshirePopulation 6,804

46.96/ 100

Ranked #20,212 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #236 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (bottom 2.9%)

Ranked #272 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (bottom 3.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.3%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

70.6%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST53rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

2.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

11.5 mi

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US80th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

35%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US77th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

18.9%

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US79th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

72.1%

in the bottom 25% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 41% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US59th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

Farmington, New Hampshire (ZIP 03835), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 37% nationally (20,212th) and the bottom 2.9% of New Hampshire (236th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled tree cover stands in the top 8.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Transit rests in the top 12.6% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits in the top 21% nationally. Recreation registers in the top 23% nationally. Working the other way, distance to a Superfund site lands at the national minimum, and modeled energy burden resides in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled arsenic lies in the top 12.7% nationally, and distance to an emergency room settles in the top 20% nationally. Childcare stands at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 03851, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.5 ± 2.5 years. The 46 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.0 years — 4.5 years below them.

    Ranked #3,208 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.6%27.9–33.4
High blood pressure among adults35.7%32.6–38.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.3–10.0
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.4–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%5.9–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.4–9.8
Depression among adults27.8%24.6–31.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.5–12.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%34.4–41.0
Obesity among adults36.8%32.0–41.8
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.9%15.8–22.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%6.8–10.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.3%71.2–77.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.2%74.0–80.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%83.7–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.9%58.6–67.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.6%55.2–62.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.1%65.8–78.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.2–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.3%13.0–17.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.0%20.6–27.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.7%29.4–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.8%16.3–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%17.1–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%12.5–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.0%13.2–17.1
Any disability among adults30.7%27.3–34.4
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.2–9.0
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.5–9.8
Mobility disability among adults13.7%11.9–15.7
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.6%21.4–27.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.2%11.6–17.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.0–13.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.5–13.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.7–9.0
Loneliness among adults35.0%31.1–38.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.6–9.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–647.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)11.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle6.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription94.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate77.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households65.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+18.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age49.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$66,982$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$289,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$1,096$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.5 yr ± 1.2778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.27 years of 76.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured