Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05472

in New Haven, VermontPopulation 1,938

61.47/ 100

Ranked #3,825 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.0%)

Ranked #44 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

28.3%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.9%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.9%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

14.0%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.4%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST75th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

9.1%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST34th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

25.8 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

29.5 days/year

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

New Haven, Vermont (ZIP 05472), in overall standing, comes out in the top 12.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,825th) and the top 18% of Vermont (44th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A healthy showing across the board, and a few measures carry it: modeled short sleep is in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and poverty lies in the bottom 9.4% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled obesity is in the bottom 12.4% nationally, and cognitive disability lies in the bottom 9.5% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health registers in the bottom 9.5% nationally, and colon screening is in the top 9.2% nationally. Modeled diabetes lies in the bottom 9.4% nationally, and independent living disability registers in the bottom 11.2% nationally. Modeled mobility disability is in the bottom 13.6% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 05473, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 51%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%27.9–34.1
High blood pressure among adults34.7%31.3–38.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.9%9.9–12.0
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.4%5.3–7.5
Depression among adults23.9%20.9–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.1%7.7–10.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%32.7–39.6
Obesity among adults28.4%23.8–33.1
Stroke among adults3.4%3.0–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.0%8.8–13.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.6%4.4–7.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.1–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%77.0–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults89.2%87.5–90.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.4%68.4–75.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.8%69.8–75.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%73.5–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%12.9–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.2%8.1–12.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.2%15.0–21.7
Short sleep duration among adults28.3%24.3–32.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.0%11.7–16.5
Frequent mental distress among adults14.1%12.2–16.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%10.7–14.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.9%9.3–12.6
Any disability among adults23.9%20.5–27.5
Hearing disability among adults7.9%6.9–8.9
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.2–7.2
Mobility disability among adults10.9%9.1–12.8
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–649.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)3.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)34.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription90.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate79.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population7.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households61.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+23.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age47.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$92,537$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$378,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$1,167$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.8 yr ± 1.0178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.01 years of 83.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured