Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05648

in Calais, VermontPopulation 483

60.86/ 100

Ranked #4,227 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.2%)

Ranked #50 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

23.1%

in the bottom 0.06% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.6%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

26.6%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

76.3%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST57th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.3%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.8%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.8%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Calais, Vermont (ZIP 05648) ranks in the top 13.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,227th) and the top 20% of Vermont (50th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled short sleep is in the bottom 0.06% nationally, and transportation noise settles at the national minimum. Modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and fiber broadband registers in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled obesity rests in the bottom 8.4% nationally, and tree cover stands in the top 6.4% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled cognitive disability lands in the bottom 6.3% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat is in the bottom 10.1% nationally.

To spell things out, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 05602, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 99%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.6%30.3–36.8
High blood pressure among adults34.9%31.4–38.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.7%11.5–13.9
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.1–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%5.4–8.8
Depression among adults25.9%22.9–29.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.4%8.7–12.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%35.1–41.3
Obesity among adults26.6%22.5–30.9
Stroke among adults3.7%3.1–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.3%10.0–14.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.8%3.3–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.5%78.7–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%76.2–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults90.3%88.4–91.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.0%69.2–76.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.8%72.2–77.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.9%68.6–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.7%11.7–15.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.8%8.0–13.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.1%14.1–22.4
Short sleep duration among adults23.1%19.8–26.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.8%10.9–16.9
Frequent mental distress among adults13.4%11.6–15.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%10.3–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.3%8.4–12.3
Any disability among adults26.2%22.0–30.7
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.3–9.9
Independent living disability among adults6.1%4.9–7.4
Mobility disability among adults11.4%9.0–14.0
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.5–3.8
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.0–4.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–6410.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)4.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)61.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription96.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate93.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households72.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+30.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age44.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$71,719$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$428,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$1,444$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.4 yr ± 2.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.62 years of 85.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured