Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05056

in Plymouth, VermontPopulation 352

58.60/ 100

Ranked #5,898 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #82 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

92.6%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

12.8%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

1.4%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.5%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.04%

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

30%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST49th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.9%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.5%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST77th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.0%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Plymouth, Vermont (ZIP 05056), by its composite score, sits in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,898th) and the top 33% of Vermont (82nd).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled tree cover stands in the top 0.7% nationally, and poverty registers in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Modeled transportation noise settles in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep lies in the bottom 9.7% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden rests in the bottom 9.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled fair or poor health is in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Pulling the other way, crowded housing lands in the top 3.0% nationally, and modeled energy burden stands in the top 5.2% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 05738, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.2%27.1–33.3
High blood pressure among adults34.1%30.7–37.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.4%10.2–12.6
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%5.8–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.2–8.3
Depression among adults26.2%23.1–29.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.6%8.1–11.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.3%31.0–37.6
Obesity among adults29.3%24.7–33.9
Stroke among adults3.5%3.0–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.6%10.2–15.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.0%3.5–7.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%75.8–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.3%72.0–78.3
Cholesterol screening among adults89.7%87.8–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.5%68.5–76.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.8%69.8–75.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.9%70.8–82.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.9–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.3%8.4–14.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.7%14.8–22.8
Short sleep duration among adults30.0%25.8–34.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.9%11.0–17.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.2%12.2–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.1–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.0%9.1–13.3
Any disability among adults24.9%20.8–29.3
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.1–9.5
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.0–7.5
Mobility disability among adults11.0%8.8–13.5
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.6–3.9
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.1–4.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–645.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)1.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)51.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle2.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription90.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate73.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)12.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population1.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households51.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+31.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age45.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$74,896$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$335,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$1,361$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.8 yr ± 1.7578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.75 years of 83.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured