Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05053

in North Pomfret, VermontPopulation 333

60.64/ 100

Ranked #4,366 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.7%)

Ranked #54 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

79.4%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

9.2%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.6%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

27.4%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST46th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

70.1%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST46th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.0%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, North Pomfret, Vermont (ZIP 05053) ranks in the top 13.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,366th) and the top 22% of Vermont (54th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: fiber broadband is at the national maximum, and modeled colon screening settles in the top 0.3% nationally. Modeled transportation noise resides at the national minimum, and short sleep registers in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Unemployment rests at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled obesity stands in the bottom 10.0% nationally, expected annual loss lies in the bottom 8.5% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden lands in the bottom 8.6% nationally. Modeled tree cover sits in the top 9.1% nationally. Set against that, crowded housing is in the top 5.3% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Close by, ZIP 05091, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.3%29.0–35.7
High blood pressure among adults35.2%31.6–38.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.8%11.5–14.1
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.1–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.1–8.5
Depression among adults25.7%22.6–29.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.9%8.2–11.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.7%32.2–39.1
Obesity among adults27.4%23.1–32.2
Stroke among adults3.8%3.1–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.6%5.1–8.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.5%3.1–6.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.6%78.7–84.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.5%74.3–80.2
Cholesterol screening among adults90.4%88.5–92.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years79.4%75.9–82.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.7%69.7–75.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.4%68.2–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.4%11.3–15.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.8%6.9–12.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.8%14.5–23.3
Short sleep duration among adults28.6%24.7–32.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.6%10.6–16.8
Frequent mental distress among adults13.6%11.5–15.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.0–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.6%8.5–12.8
Any disability among adults25.8%21.3–30.3
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.6–10.3
Independent living disability among adults6.3%4.9–7.7
Mobility disability among adults11.6%9.0–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.4–3.8
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.0–4.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–641.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)1.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)63.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle10.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription89.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate87.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)9.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households48.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+20.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age45.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$99,722$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$388,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth86.5 yr ± 1.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.90 years of 86.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured