Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05059

in Quechee, VermontPopulation 510

60.99/ 100

Ranked #4,132 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.9%)

Ranked #49 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.74 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

13.2%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

12.5%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST51st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.6%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

32.1%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.6%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Quechee, Vermont (ZIP 05059) stands in the top 12.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,132nd) and the top 20% of Vermont (49th).

continue reading

The bright spots in the data define much of the story here: home broadband subscription resides at the national maximum, and childcare stands in the top 4.7% nationally. Fiber broadband sits in the top 4.8% nationally, and transit resides in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health stands in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Households without a vehicle sits at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 9.5% nationally, and mobility disability stands in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. On the other side, unemployment resides in the top 5.1% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. ZIP 05091, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.4%24.7–30.1
High blood pressure among adults30.9%27.9–34.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.5–11.4
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%4.7–6.8
Depression among adults26.9%23.8–30.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.6%7.4–10.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.1%29.0–35.1
Obesity among adults28.1%24.0–32.5
Stroke among adults3.1%2.7–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.2–12.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.7%3.6–6.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.0%75.1–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.5%71.1–77.5
Cholesterol screening among adults88.4%86.5–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.4%68.4–76.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.2%66.0–72.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.5%69.3–81.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%13.2–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.7%7.6–12.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.2%14.3–20.5
Short sleep duration among adults31.7%27.5–36.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.5%10.5–14.9
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%12.7–16.5
Frequent physical distress among adults11.1%9.6–12.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.0%9.3–12.7
Any disability among adults23.3%20.2–26.7
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.4–8.3
Independent living disability among adults5.9%5.0–6.9
Mobility disability among adults9.6%8.0–11.4
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.4–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.0–4.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)6.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)75.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)13.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate89.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households53.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+44.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age49.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$365,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth87.8 yr ± 3.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.58 years of 87.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured