Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

04088

in Waterford, MainePopulation 1,269

47.32/ 100

Ranked #19,770 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranked #226 of 408 Maine ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

18 mi

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

73.7%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.65 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.3%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.1%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST57th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

31.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 12.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.5 pCi/L

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US79th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 32% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US68th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Waterford, Maine (ZIP 04088) ranks in the bottom 38% nationally (19,770th) and the bottom 45% of Maine (226th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides in the top 5.9% nationally, and modeled tree cover registers in the top 7.4% nationally. Civic rests in the top 8.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled mammography lands in the top 11.7% nationally. Crowded housing sits at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Set against that, slow internet speeds is in the top 9.0% nationally, and modeled energy burden settles in the top 8.2% nationally. Fatal road crashes resides in the top 12.1% nationally.

To spell things out, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Close by, ZIP 04009, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 73.1; chronic-disease standing 15.8 — 57 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,931 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.3%33.5–39.6
High blood pressure among adults38.6%35.6–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%10.0–12.3
Current asthma among adults13.2%11.9–14.9
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%7.9–10.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.4%8.5–12.5
Depression among adults25.7%23.0–29.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.8–15.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.1%39.0–45.6
Obesity among adults34.4%30.3–39.5
Stroke among adults4.4%3.8–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.8%16.6–23.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.0–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%75.8–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.3%79.7–84.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%85.9–89.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.2%64.1–72.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.8%58.6–65.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.9%74.6–84.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.8–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.5%13.1–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.1%20.2–28.6
Short sleep duration among adults32.7%28.5–36.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.4%17.9–25.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.9–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.1–19.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.9%13.4–18.8
Any disability among adults32.8%28.6–37.5
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.4–10.8
Independent living disability among adults9.2%7.7–11.0
Mobility disability among adults16.2%13.4–19.2
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.6–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.4–6.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%20.0–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%9.8–16.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.0%13.3–21.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%8.9–13.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.9–9.9
Loneliness among adults31.1%27.6–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.0–10.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–647.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)5.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription89.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate88.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households59.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+27.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age54.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$63,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$276,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$870$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 2.2278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.22 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured