Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03832

in Eaton Center, New HampshirePopulation 501

62.56/ 100

Ranked #3,199 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.0%)

Ranked #56 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.3%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.1%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

84.2%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.0%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

75.8%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.2%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.4%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

96.9%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.0%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Eaton Center, New Hampshire (ZIP 03832) places in the top 10.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,199th) and the top 23% of New Hampshire (56th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and transportation registers in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity settles in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and tree cover sits in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lies in the bottom 3.8% nationally, colon screening rests in the top 2.1% nationally, and food insecurity resides in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Modeled loneliness is in the bottom 4.5% nationally, homeownership lands in the top 6.6% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability stands in the bottom 5.1% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 03849, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.7%30.9–38.3
High blood pressure among adults36.7%32.8–40.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.0%12.6–15.5
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.1–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%5.8–9.5
Depression among adults20.7%17.7–23.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.1–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%37.2–44.5
Obesity among adults29.5%24.5–34.9
Stroke among adults4.0%3.4–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.0%6.4–9.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.7%4.2–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.8%80.9–86.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.6%78.6–84.3
Cholesterol screening among adults92.3%90.8–93.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years75.8%71.9–79.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.2%70.0–76.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%73.3–84.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.1%10.8–15.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.7%7.1–12.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.7%15.5–24.4
Short sleep duration among adults30.7%26.2–35.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.4%11.5–17.7
Frequent mental distress among adults12.8%10.7–14.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%10.6–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.0%8.2–12.0
Any disability among adults25.9%21.6–30.8
Hearing disability among adults9.7%8.3–11.2
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.1–7.7
Mobility disability among adults13.1%10.5–16.3
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.6–3.9
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.2–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.4%16.0–23.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.3–9.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.0%3.4–6.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.1%4.7–7.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.5–5.3
Loneliness among adults27.4%23.4–31.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.0%3.2–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–642.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)1.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)51.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle1.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription91.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate96.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population1.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households71.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+41.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age59.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$79,063$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$377,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth86.5 yr ± 3.5778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.57 years of 86.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured