ZIP code
03845
in Intervale, New HampshirePopulation 1,173
60.41/ 100
Ranked #4,546 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.2%)
Ranked #104 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (top 43%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Tree cover
83.9%
in the top 3.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST88thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Park land
34.7%
in the top 4.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST92ndUS96thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
21.9 mi
in the top 4.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Industrial-pollution burden
in the bottom 4.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST20thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
4.8%
in the bottom 5.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST25thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
6.8%
in the bottom 6.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST26thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
28%
in the bottom 7.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST26thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
8.1%
in the bottom 7.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST32ndUS8thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
4.7%
in the bottom 9.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST29thUS10thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
10.7%
in the bottom 8.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST24thUS8thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›The read
Intervale, New Hampshire (ZIP 03845) ranks in the top 14.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,546th) and the top 43% of New Hampshire (104th).
The strongest marks in the data are worth naming first: modeled tree cover lies in the top 3.5% nationally, and park land is in the top 4.0% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 4.0% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Modeled transportation is in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and housing insecurity registers in the bottom 6.0% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness is in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and food insecurity registers in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.
Against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 03846, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 94%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 93%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 80%
8%
Disability
healthier than 77%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 79%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 55%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 59%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 57%
14%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 36%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 82%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 78%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 74%
8%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 48%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 56%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 43%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 29%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 39%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 39%
14%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
03813
New Hampshireshares a border
Score 56.94
Closest healthier
03846
New Hampshireshares a border
Score 60.58
Similar health profile
05161
Vermont99% similar profile
Score 64.02
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 32.9% | 29.5–36.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 34.6% | 30.9–38.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 12.5% | 11.3–13.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.3% | 9.0–11.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.6% | 6.5–8.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 7.3% | 5.8–9.2 |
| Depression among adults | 22.1% | 19.0–25.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 10.4% | 8.7–12.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 39.0% | 35.4–42.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 30.6% | 25.6–35.9 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.7% | 3.1–4.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 9.6% | 7.8–11.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 5.7% | 4.1–7.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.4% | 79.4–84.9 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 80.2% | 77.3–83.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 91.1% | 89.5–92.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 70.8% | 66.6–74.5 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 72.0% | 68.8–74.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 79.8% | 74.1–84.8 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.1% | 11.7–16.5 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 10.3% | 7.8–13.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 19.8% | 15.6–24.1 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 31.0% | 26.5–35.5 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 14.5% | 11.6–17.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 13.9% | 11.9–16.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.8% | 10.7–14.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 10.7% | 8.8–12.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 25.3% | 21.1–29.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.6% | 7.4–9.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.5% | 5.3–7.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 12.7% | 10.2–15.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.2% | 2.6–4.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.9% | 3.3–4.8 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.3% | 16.1–22.8 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.1% | 5.9–10.5 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 5.9% | 4.1–8.0 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 6.8% | 5.3–8.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 4.8% | 3.9–5.9 |
| Loneliness among adults | 28.0% | 24.1–32.2 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.7% | 3.7–5.7 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 11.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 6.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 31.7% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 4.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 4.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 47.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 38.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 2.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243 |
| Broadband subscription | 82.8% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 92.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 26.1% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243 |
| Homeownership rate | 76.8% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 86.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243 |
| Foreign-born population | 4.5% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 3.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243 |
| Single-parent households | 71.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 60.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243 |
| Population 65+ | 33.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243 |
| Median age | 53.9 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 47.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243 |
| Median household income | $57,320 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237 |
| Median gross rent | $1,630 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 81.5 yr ± 1.18 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 81.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.18 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured