Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

04105

in Falmouth, MainePopulation 12,755

67.36/ 100

Ranked #1,171 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 3.7%)

Ranked #2 of 408 Maine ZIPs (top 0.5%)

Ranked #2 of 82 Portland-South Portland, ME ZIPs (top 2.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Food insecurity

4.9%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.4%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$150,919

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

26.5%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24.2%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.5%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.0%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Falmouth, Maine (ZIP 04105) sits in the top 3.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,171st) and the top 0.5% of Maine (2nd).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled food insecurity resides in the bottom 0.3% nationally, modeled housing insecurity sits in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and household income stands in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled short sleep resides in the bottom 1.1% nationally, dental providers sits in the top 2.1% nationally, and modeled obesity stands in the bottom 4.4% nationally. Modeled transportation resides in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and utility shutoff sits in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Recreation stands in the top 4.3% nationally, and physicians resides in the top 4.9% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 04107, about 3.2 miles away. Across other measures, the ZIP also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Portland-South Portland, ME metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.8%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 99%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.8 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $150,919 predicts 81.7 years — 2.1 years above.

    Ranked #859 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.8 ± 1.7 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.4 years — 3.5 years above them.

    Ranked #565 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 22.8; chronic-disease standing 79.4 — 57 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,065 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.8%26.4–31.2
High blood pressure among adults32.8%30.2–35.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.2%10.3–12.1
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.4–6.0
Depression among adults23.2%20.8–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.5%7.5–9.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.7%32.9–38.4
Obesity among adults24.2%20.9–27.5
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.3%5.2–7.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.4%3.5–5.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.7%73.7–79.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.6%80.3–84.7
Cholesterol screening among adults91.5%90.2–92.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years75.2%72.3–78.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults78.2%76.1–80.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.5%78.3–86.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.3%14.2–18.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.8%6.4–9.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults14.2%12.2–16.6
Short sleep duration among adults26.5%23.5–29.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.8%10.2–13.5
Frequent mental distress among adults13.6%12.1–15.2
Frequent physical distress among adults10.7%9.5–12.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.3%9.1–11.7
Any disability among adults23.2%20.8–26.0
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Independent living disability among adults5.3%4.6–6.1
Mobility disability among adults9.5%8.2–10.9
Self-care disability among adults2.2%1.9–2.6
Vision disability among adults2.7%2.4–3.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.0%16.8–21.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.0–5.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.6–7.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.4–6.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Loneliness among adults28.6%25.9–31.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.0%3.4–4.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–642.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)1.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)72.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle5.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription94.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate84.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population7.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households49.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+24.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age47.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$150,919$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$767,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$2,120$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.8 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 83.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured