Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

04984

in Temple, MainePopulation 824

45.90/ 100

Ranked #21,457 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #257 of 408 Maine ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

89.6%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.7%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.5%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST16th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.6%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST73rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

36.6%

in the top 14.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

3.8%

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US80th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 32% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US68th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Temple, Maine (ZIP 04984) ranks in the bottom 33% nationally (21,457th) and the bottom 37% of Maine (257th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: modeled energy burden is in the top 3.9% nationally, and slow internet speeds stands in the top 7.5% nationally. Walkability settles in the bottom 8.7% nationally, and modeled tooth loss lies in the top 11.5% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled tree cover resides in the top 1.5% nationally, and transportation noise lands at the national minimum. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat sits in the bottom 10.7% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise rests at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled mammography is in the top 8.3% nationally.

In plainer terms, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 04938, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.8%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.10%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.0%31.6–38.0
High blood pressure among adults39.1%35.5–42.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.6–11.8
Current asthma among adults13.2%11.6–14.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%7.8–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.0–11.8
Depression among adults27.5%24.1–30.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.3–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%36.4–43.1
Obesity among adults35.4%30.5–40.3
Stroke among adults4.2%3.6–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.4%18.7–26.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.2–10.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.5%73.3–79.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%77.3–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%85.8–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.3%67.4–74.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.7%55.2–61.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.6%75.1–85.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.2–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.8%13.4–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.9%21.6–30.3
Short sleep duration among adults36.5%32.0–40.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.2%17.6–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.1–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%13.5–18.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%14.2–19.2
Any disability among adults36.1%31.4–40.6
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.6–11.2
Independent living disability among adults8.9%7.4–10.4
Mobility disability among adults15.8%13.2–18.6
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.4–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.2–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.7%21.1–28.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%9.5–15.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.3%12.8–20.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.1–13.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.8–9.7
Loneliness among adults34.5%30.4–39.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.7–9.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–6420.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)4.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription82.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate92.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households55.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+15.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age34.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$56,087$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$210,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$1,458$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 1.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.58 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured