Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03847

in Kearsarge, New HampshirePopulation 87

57.72/ 100

Ranked #6,632 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #153 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

20.8 mi

in the top 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.6%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Kearsarge, New Hampshire (ZIP 03847) sits in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,632nd) and the bottom 37% of New Hampshire (153rd).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: housing-cost burden registers at the national minimum, modeled transportation noise is at the national minimum, and poverty lies at the national minimum. Homeownership registers at the national maximum, home broadband subscription is at the national maximum, and floodplain exposure lies at the national minimum. Modeled expected annual loss registers in the bottom 3.5% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 4.5% nationally, and modeled loneliness registers in the bottom 5.4% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 03845, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.4%32.9–39.9
High blood pressure among adults38.3%34.5–42.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.5%12.2–15.0
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.3–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.6–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%6.9–10.5
Depression among adults22.0%18.9–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.3–14.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.0%37.3–44.7
Obesity among adults31.9%26.6–37.5
Stroke among adults4.4%3.7–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.8%10.3–15.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%4.5–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.0%81.1–86.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%78.6–84.4
Cholesterol screening among adults91.6%90.0–93.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.1%69.1–76.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.9%63.3–70.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.2%70.9–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.6%10.4–15.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.2%8.4–14.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.1%17.7–26.6
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%28.5–37.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.5%13.5–19.7
Frequent mental distress among adults13.9%12.0–16.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%11.9–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.3%9.4–13.3
Any disability among adults28.3%24.0–32.7
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.6–11.4
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.1–9.0
Mobility disability among adults15.1%12.3–17.9
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.2–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.0–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.2%16.2–22.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.2%6.8–12.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.0–9.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%5.7–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.4–6.7
Loneliness among adults27.6%23.8–32.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.2–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)100.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+81.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age70.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.6 yr ± 1.7178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.71 years of 82.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured