Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02633

in Chatham, MassachusettsPopulation 4,512

66.47/ 100

Ranked #1,455 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 4.6%)

Ranked #90 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #6 of 47 Barnstable Town, MA ZIPs (top 12.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

79%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

82.2%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.6%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.64 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

26.8%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

84.2%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST58th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.5%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.3%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

23.8 mi

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Chatham, Massachusetts (ZIP 02633) ranks in the top 4.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,455th) and the top 17% of Massachusetts (90th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled colon screening rests in the top 0.4% nationally, and housing insecurity stands in the bottom 1.6% nationally. Elder services lies in the top 1.7% nationally, and modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 1.4% nationally. Modeled mammography sits in the top 1.2% nationally, food insecurity is in the bottom 2.4% nationally, and transportation settles in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides in the top 3.4% nationally, and recreation registers in the top 3.5% nationally. Set against that, modeled pfas rests in the top 1.5% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Close by, ZIP 02659, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Barnstable Town, MA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.04%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.9%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.8%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.4%35.8–43.0
High blood pressure among adults41.8%37.9–45.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults16.0%14.5–17.5
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.2–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.3–8.5
Depression among adults20.9%18.0–23.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%9.9–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.0%38.9–47.1
Obesity among adults25.2%20.5–30.3
Stroke among adults4.2%3.7–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.5%6.7–10.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.0%2.5–3.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.9%83.3–88.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults87.7%85.5–89.7
Cholesterol screening among adults94.8%93.9–95.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years79.0%75.0–82.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults79.4%76.6–81.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years84.2%78.5–88.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.9%9.8–14.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.4%6.9–10.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.3%15.3–21.7
Short sleep duration among adults26.8%22.3–31.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.9%12.9–17.2
Frequent mental distress among adults11.7%10.3–13.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.6–14.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.7%8.5–11.1
Any disability among adults28.6%25.1–32.4
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.4–10.7
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.4
Mobility disability among adults14.5%12.5–16.7
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.7–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.2%15.4–21.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.2–7.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.2–9.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.6–6.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.7–5.0
Loneliness among adults27.5%23.6–31.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.1%3.4–4.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–642.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)1.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)62.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription89.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate84.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population9.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households75.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+45.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age63.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$85,483$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$946,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,471$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 1.0178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.01 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured