Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03581

in Gorham, New HampshirePopulation 3,246

57.61/ 100

Ranked #6,714 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #154 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

92.4%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Park land

70.5%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.33 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

11.1 per million

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.66 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.9 pCi/L

in the top 11.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

8.3%

in the top 11.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

16 days/year

in the bottom 12.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.8%

in the top 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.9 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 14.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

Gorham, New Hampshire (ZIP 03581), by its overall standing, sits in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,714th) and the bottom 37% of New Hampshire (154th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: modeled tree cover lands in the top 0.7% nationally, park land is in the top 1.1% nationally, and grocery resides in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the bottom 5.6% nationally, and childcare lies in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center settles at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled radon registers in the top 11.7% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site stands in the bottom 11.1% nationally. Modeled transportation noise lands in the top 11.4% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 03593, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.0%29.6–36.4
High blood pressure among adults36.6%32.8–40.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.3%10.3–12.5
Current asthma among adults11.3%9.9–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.4–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.5–9.0
Depression among adults21.9%18.7–25.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.0–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%34.7–42.4
Obesity among adults34.5%28.9–40.4
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.1%9.2–13.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.2–7.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.5%77.4–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.7–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults89.8%88.2–91.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.4%67.1–75.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.0%61.5–68.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%72.4–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.0–17.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.5%10.1–14.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.2%20.2–28.3
Short sleep duration among adults31.0%26.3–35.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.6%14.1–19.3
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%12.8–16.7
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.3–15.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.5–14.1
Any disability among adults30.1%26.1–34.3
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.8
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.2–8.3
Mobility disability among adults13.8%11.6–16.0
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.7–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%18.6–25.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.8–11.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.6–8.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.4–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.8–6.6
Loneliness among adults30.5%26.5–34.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.5–6.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–6413.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)2.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)1.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle5.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription90.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate73.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households73.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+31.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age53.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$64,127$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$196,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$855$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.6 yr ± 2.0778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.07 years of 81.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured