ZIP code
74108
in Tulsa, OklahomaPopulation 7,315
37.14/ 100
Ranked #28,458 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.3%)
Ranked #424 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 33%)
Ranked #60 of 88 Tulsa, OK ZIPs (bottom 32%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Industrial-pollution burden
in the top 5.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
20.8%
in the top 6.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST89thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
24.8%
in the top 7.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST89thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Uninsured (under 65)
17.6%
in the top 6.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.
Full methodology ›Mammography
67.8%
in the bottom 7.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST52ndUS7thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
57%
in the bottom 7.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST15thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
14.4%
in the top 8.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
26.8%
in the top 8.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
19.9%
in the top 9.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Dry extreme heat
50.8 days/year
in the top 9.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST28thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, ZIP 74108, one of several in Tulsa, Oklahoma lands in the bottom 11.3% nationally (28,458th) and the bottom 33% of Oklahoma (424th).
A number of measures pull each way for this area: modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 5.5% nationally. Set against that, modeled cognitive disability sits in the top 6.6% nationally, and tooth loss is in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled uninsured settles in the top 6.9% nationally, mammography resides in the bottom 7.2% nationally, and colon screening registers in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the top 8.0% nationally, food insecurity stands in the top 8.9% nationally, and housing insecurity lies in the top 9.1% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lands in the top 9.2% nationally.
Set beside the nearby areas, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 74015, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tulsa, OK metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Healthcare Access
healthier than 69%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 40%
21%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 10%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 32%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 6%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 16%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 9%
8%
Disability
healthier than 12%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 24%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 74%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 83%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 74%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 14%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 30%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 7%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 29%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 7%
8%
Disability
healthier than 33%
7%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 63%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 78%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 62%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 57%
14%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 16%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 11%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 28%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 13%
8%
Disability
healthier than 30%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Below what income predicts
The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes
Estimated life expectancy is 73.0 ± 2.0 years. A median household income of $59,335 predicts 78.0 years — 5.0 years below.
Ranked #5,538 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.
Below its nearby ZIPs
The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors
Estimated life expectancy is 73.0 ± 2.0 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.1 years — 3.1 years below them.
Ranked #2,449 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
74015
Oklahomashares a border
Score 42.89
Closest healthier
74134
Oklahomashares a border
Score 46.95
Similar health profile
74464
Oklahoma98% similar profile
Score 39.22
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 25.8% | 24.0–27.9 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 37.4% | 35.1–40.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 6.7% | 6.2–7.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.8% | 10.7–13.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.5% | 6.9–8.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.2% | 8.3–10.3 |
| Depression among adults | 27.8% | 25.4–30.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.7% | 12.4–15.2 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 36.0% | 33.6–38.7 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.7% | 35.3–42.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.0% | 3.7–4.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 24.8% | 21.5–28.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 17.6% | 15.5–20.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 75.0% | 73.0–77.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 75.0% | 72.5–77.6 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 81.3% | 79.5–83.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 57.0% | 53.3–60.7 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 50.3% | 47.5–53.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 67.8% | 61.6–73.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.1% | 11.5–15.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 19.2% | 17.3–21.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 37.8% | 34.8–41.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.6% | 35.2–42.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 26.4% | 24.2–29.1 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 20.1% | 18.4–21.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.3% | 14.9–17.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 20.8% | 19.0–22.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 43.9% | 41.0–47.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.4% | 8.6–10.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.8% | 10.8–13.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 19.3% | 17.7–21.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.5% | 5.0–5.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 8.1% | 7.4–8.8 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 29.3% | 26.1–32.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 26.8% | 23.9–29.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 22.9% | 20.1–25.7 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 19.9% | 17.6–22.1 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 13.3% | 11.9–14.7 |
| Loneliness among adults | 37.4% | 33.5–41.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 14.4% | 12.8–16.0 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 22.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 26.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 19.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 19.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 10.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 12.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 8.5% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643 |
| Households without a vehicle | 4.1% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643 |
| Broadband subscription | 89.7% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 26.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643 |
| Homeownership rate | 66.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 5.5% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643 |
| Foreign-born population | 15.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645 |
| Single-parent households | 52.4% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640 |
| Population 65+ | 16.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645 |
| Median age | 34.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642 |
| Median household income | $59,335 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616 |
| Median home value | $133,800 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615 |
| Median gross rent | $1,113 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $839 ($628–$1,136) n=546 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 73.0 yr ± 1.04 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.04 years of 73.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured