Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

74446

in Okay, OklahomaPopulation 436

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

33.98/ 100

Ranked #29,744 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.3%)

Ranked #506 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #69 of 88 Tulsa, OK ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outer-floodplain exposure

16.7%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST51st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

11.0%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

56.9%

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST14th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.2%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.1%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.2%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

19.9%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

Okay, Oklahoma (ZIP 74446), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 7.3% nationally (29,744th) and the bottom 20% of Oklahoma (506th).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: outer-floodplain exposure lands in the top 2.4% nationally, modeled mammography resides in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and modeled transportation noise lies in the top 7.3% nationally. Modeled colon screening settles in the bottom 7.2% nationally, modeled hearing disability stands in the top 8.0% nationally, and crowded housing is in the top 8.3% nationally. Modeled mobility disability rests in the top 9.0% nationally. More positively, modeled disaster risk sits in the bottom 5.2% nationally, and expected annual loss registers in the bottom 7.7% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 74403, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tulsa, OK metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.1%30.7–37.8
High blood pressure among adults44.2%40.1–48.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.9–9.7
Current asthma among adults13.0%11.6–14.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.9–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.3%9.8–12.7
Depression among adults27.5%23.9–31.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.7%13.7–17.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%35.5–44.1
Obesity among adults40.9%34.2–48.1
Stroke among adults4.8%4.4–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.7%14.6–21.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.9%8.2–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%75.4–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.8%75.2–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.5–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.9%51.7–61.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.3%47.4–55.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.7%58.8–75.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.3%10.8–16.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.4%19.1–25.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.2%30.3–40.4
Short sleep duration among adults41.9%35.7–48.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.6%22.3–29.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.3–21.9
Frequent physical distress among adults17.8%15.7–20.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.9%17.6–22.4
Any disability among adults44.6%39.9–49.5
Hearing disability among adults11.2%10.0–12.5
Independent living disability among adults12.0%10.5–13.5
Mobility disability among adults22.2%19.4–25.1
Self-care disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Vision disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.8%22.1–29.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.4%19.1–26.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.0%17.7–24.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.0%13.7–18.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.3–13.4
Loneliness among adults33.1%28.1–38.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.8%11.1–14.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6426.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)15.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)6.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription78.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate74.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population7.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households40.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+17.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age38.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$39,485$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$75,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$1,008$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 2.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.90 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured