Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99674

in Sutton, AlaskaPopulation 1,774

46.49/ 100

Ranked #20,770 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #74 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #24 of 27 Anchorage, AK ZIPs (bottom 11.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

9.4 per million

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST50th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.11 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST21st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

64.6%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST70th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

11.5%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

50.7 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

13.7%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US21st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

40.9%

in the top 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US76th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Sutton, Alaska (ZIP 99674) stands in the bottom 35% nationally (20,770th) and the top 35% of Alaska (74th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The weightiest signals in the profile are worth naming up front: walkability rests in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and modeled mammography lands in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Crowded housing settles in the top 3.6% nationally, and fatal road crashes rests in the top 3.7% nationally. Unemployment lands in the top 12.1% nationally. More positively, modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the bottom 0.4% nationally. Households without a vehicle rests at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the bottom 8.0% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs.

For clarity, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 99567, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Environmental HazardPartial

in the top 0.3%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

9%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

6%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

22%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

17%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Disability

healthier than 35%

8%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.2%30.3–35.8
High blood pressure among adults38.9%35.6–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.6–10.4
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.4–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.2–10.7
Depression among adults21.7%19.0–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.0%10.5–13.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%37.4–44.0
Obesity among adults39.2%34.5–43.5
Stroke among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.0%14.9–21.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.8%8.2–11.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.1%69.7–75.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.0%70.8–76.8
Cholesterol screening among adults82.6%80.5–84.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.3%56.2–64.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.1%52.9–59.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years64.6%58.0–71.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.7%11.6–15.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.8%17.0–22.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.4%22.8–29.8
Short sleep duration among adults33.6%29.8–37.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.2%19.4–25.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%14.1–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.3–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%13.4–16.9
Any disability among adults36.6%32.9–40.2
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
Independent living disability among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Mobility disability among adults16.4%14.3–18.5
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.5%21.6–27.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.3%12.2–16.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.3–13.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.0–13.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.6–9.8
Loneliness among adults31.3%27.9–34.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.8–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230
Uninsured 18–6412.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28620.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225
No HS diploma (25+)5.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230
Unemployment rate (16+)9.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2748.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,32231.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228
Broadband subscription84.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228
Homeownership rate84.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228
Crowded housing (>1 per room)11.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3228.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231
Single-parent households58.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08744.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221
Population 65+23.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55312.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231
Median age49.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226
Median household income$63,688$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197
Median home value$233,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178
Median gross rent$911$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.9 yr ± 0.9478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.94 years of 76.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured