Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99588

in Glennallen, AlaskaPopulation 1,037

48.88/ 100

Ranked #17,821 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #54 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #17 of 27 Anchorage, AK ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dental provider access

3.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

8.4 per million

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST34th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST19th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

56.3 mi

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST45th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

63.8 mi

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

57.1 mi

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST49th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.8%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Glennallen, Alaska (ZIP 99588) sits in the bottom 44% nationally (17,821st) and the top 26% of Alaska (54th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: walkability lies in the bottom 0.4% nationally, distance to a nursing home registers in the top 0.6% nationally, and distance to an emergency room is in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled energy burden lies in the top 3.7% nationally. On the stronger side, dental providers registers in the top 0.3% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the bottom 0.3% nationally. Elder services lies in the top 0.5% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 0.7% nationally. Outpatient is in the top 1.2% nationally, and civic lies in the top 2.9% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, dental providers runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 99737, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Environmental HazardPartial

in the top 0.00%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

9%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

22%

Disability

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

17%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

6%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.0%26.0–32.4
High blood pressure among adults38.9%35.0–43.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.5–10.2
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.2–9.3
Depression among adults20.0%17.2–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%10.1–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.6%32.7–40.9
Obesity among adults34.9%28.0–42.5
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.7%11.3–16.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%8.0–11.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.9%69.6–76.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.5%66.4–74.4
Cholesterol screening among adults82.9%80.7–84.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.4%55.3–65.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.9%54.2–61.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.0%58.5–74.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.4%15.4–21.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.7%16.1–21.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.3%19.8–27.7
Short sleep duration among adults36.0%29.7–42.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.7%18.2–23.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.5–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%13.4–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.9%12.3–15.9
Any disability among adults32.3%28.4–36.8
Hearing disability among adults10.0%9.0–11.1
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.5
Mobility disability among adults14.9%13.0–17.1
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.3%20.8–27.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.3%11.9–16.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.6–12.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.7–13.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.7–10.0
Loneliness among adults31.3%26.6–36.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.1–9.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230
Uninsured 18–6412.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28620.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225
No HS diploma (25+)7.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230
Unemployment rate (16+)1.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2748.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226
Households without a vehicle1.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,32231.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228
Broadband subscription85.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228
Homeownership rate64.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3228.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228
Foreign-born population1.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231
Single-parent households61.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08744.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221
Population 65+20.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55312.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231
Median age45.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226
Median household income$110,136$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197
Median home value$290,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178
Median gross rent$1,325$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 0.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.79 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured