Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99508

in Anchorage, AlaskaPopulation 36,458

46.24/ 100

Ranked #21,053 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #75 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #25 of 27 Anchorage, AK ZIPs (bottom 7.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$2

in the top 0.10% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

48 per million

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

4.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.93 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.8%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.64 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.1%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

3.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Park land

15.0%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 99508, one of several in Anchorage, Alaska, on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 34% nationally (21,053rd) and the top 36% of Alaska (75th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: modeled expected annual loss is in the top 0.10% nationally, disaster risk rests in the top 0.4% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk sits in the top 1.2% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and crowded housing lands in the top 8.3% nationally. Better still, physicians resides in the top 1.7% nationally, and outpatient lies in the top 2.2% nationally. Distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Childcare stands in the top 6.3% nationally, and transit is in the top 8.4% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 99501, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.1 ± 2.0 years. A median household income of $79,314 predicts 79.2 years — 2.1 years below.

    Ranked #2,782 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 48.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 77.1 ± 2.0 years.

    Ranked #232 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.1%21.2–25.4
High blood pressure among adults33.9%31.4–36.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.9%5.5–6.6
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.4–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.4–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%6.1–7.5
Depression among adults21.9%19.6–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.8–12.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.0%29.4–34.9
Obesity among adults38.0%34.1–42.2
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.2%12.7–17.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.6%11.1–14.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure67.5%64.9–70.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.1%67.1–73.2
Cholesterol screening among adults77.1%75.1–79.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.4%54.7–62.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.8%51.9–57.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.8%60.7–72.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.6–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.7%15.9–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.8%22.2–27.9
Short sleep duration among adults38.3%34.9–42.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.8%20.8–25.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.6–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%13.1–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.3%14.8–18.1
Any disability among adults32.6%29.9–35.8
Hearing disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.6–10.5
Mobility disability among adults14.0%12.7–15.6
Self-care disability among adults4.3%4.0–4.7
Vision disability among adults6.2%5.7–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.9%25.2–30.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.3%18.4–22.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.2%14.4–18.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.0%15.3–18.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.4%11.2–13.6
Loneliness among adults36.3%33.1–39.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.4–13.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230
Uninsured 18–6416.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28620.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225
No HS diploma (25+)8.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2748.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226
Households without a vehicle9.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,32231.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228
Broadband subscription92.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228
Homeownership rate53.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3228.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228
Foreign-born population14.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231
Single-parent households42.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08744.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221
Population 65+10.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55312.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231
Median age32.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226
Median household income$79,314$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197
Median home value$335,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178
Median gross rent$1,370$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.1 yr ± 1.0478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.04 years of 77.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured