Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98541

in Elma, WashingtonPopulation 10,810

44.73/ 100

Ranked #22,693 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #517 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 11.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.2 per million

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.8%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

38.5%

in the top 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US73rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

Elma, Washington (ZIP 98541), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 29% nationally (22,693rd) and the bottom 11.1% of Washington (517th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: distance to an emergency room is at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Mental-health providers lies in the top 11.4% nationally, and modeled tree cover sits in the top 12.3% nationally. Modeled humid heat settles in the bottom 13.2% nationally, and pfas registers in the bottom 18% nationally. By contrast, modeled expected annual loss stands in the top 13.2% nationally, and unemployment lands in the top 16% nationally. Crowded housing is in the top 18% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 98557, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.2 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $78,816 predicts 79.1 years — 2.0 years below.

    Ranked #2,579 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 95.4 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 34.3 — 61 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,653 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.8%28.2–33.3
High blood pressure among adults37.7%34.6–40.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.6–10.1
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.9–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.1–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.8–9.5
Depression among adults28.4%25.3–31.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.6–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%35.1–41.2
Obesity among adults37.5%32.8–42.2
Stroke among adults4.1%3.8–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.9%15.3–20.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.3%9.0–11.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.4%70.7–76.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.2%65.8–72.4
Cholesterol screening among adults82.1%80.3–83.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.7%59.7–67.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.7%55.7–61.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%65.5–76.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%13.8–18.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%14.4–18.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.2%21.2–27.3
Short sleep duration among adults38.5%34.2–42.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.0%20.7–25.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.8%17.9–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.7%15.1–18.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.7%16.1–19.4
Any disability among adults36.2%32.8–39.3
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.0–9.7
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.9–10.7
Mobility disability among adults16.5%14.8–18.2
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.4–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.3–6.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–649.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)13.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)7.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription92.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate78.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population4.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households56.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+17.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age44.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$78,816$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$390,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$974$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.2 yr ± 0.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 77.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured