Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

96814

in Honolulu, HawaiiPopulation 24,689

62.42/ 100

Ranked #3,285 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.3%)

Ranked #18 of 92 Hawaii ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #14 of 33 Urban Honolulu, HI ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

47.6%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

6.5%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

2.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

29%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.92 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.7%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.36 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 96814, one of several in Honolulu, Hawaii ranks in the top 10.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,285th) and the top 20% of Hawaii (18th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: dental providers is in the top 1.0% nationally, and physicians registers in the top 2.1% nationally. Outpatient lies in the top 2.3% nationally, and modeled obesity is in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Grocery registers in the top 2.8% nationally, and recreation lies in the top 3.1% nationally. By contrast, modeled short sleep is in the top 1.1% nationally, loud transportation noise registers in the top 0.8% nationally, and transportation noise lies in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled disaster risk is in the top 3.1% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 96813, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

22%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

17%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Mental Health

in the top 1.0%

9%

Disability

healthier than 77%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

6%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.9 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $77,768 predicts 79.1 years — 3.8 years above.

    Ranked #224 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.2%20.1–24.4
High blood pressure among adults33.1%30.1–36.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.1%5.6–6.6
Current asthma among adults8.7%7.8–9.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.5–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Depression among adults13.7%11.9–15.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%12.3–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%35.2–41.7
Obesity among adults23.7%19.7–27.8
Stroke among adults3.5%3.3–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.3%6.8–9.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.7%4.0–5.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.8–81.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%77.0–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults84.2%82.5–85.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.2%59.4–67.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.8%65.8–71.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.9%72.7–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.9–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.8%8.5–11.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.0%21.8–28.2
Short sleep duration among adults47.6%42.9–52.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.5%16.8–20.4
Frequent mental distress among adults12.8%11.6–14.1
Frequent physical distress among adults11.5%10.4–12.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
Any disability among adults27.2%24.4–30.0
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.8–7.1
Mobility disability among adults13.3%12.0–14.6
Self-care disability among adults3.2%3.0–3.5
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.9–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.0%27.1–33.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.7%15.9–19.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.9%10.4–13.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Loneliness among adults30.9%27.8–34.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.6–5.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (5.2–19.8%) n=86
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (1.1–10.4%) n=86
No HS diploma (25+)7.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.2% (1.5–11.7%) n=90
Bachelor's or higher (25+)49.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.6% (16.3–48.7%) n=90
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (1.9–11.7%) n=89
Households without a vehicle19.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.0%) n=86
Broadband subscription83.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (84.3–96.6%) n=86
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)47.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32235.3% (21.1–49.6%) n=86
Homeownership rate50.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32268.1% (46.6–84.7%) n=86
Crowded housing (>1 per room)12.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3227.6% (3.1–16.2%) n=86
Foreign-born population33.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55312.5% (5.0–27.3%) n=90
Single-parent households60.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.6% (41.2–64.3%) n=86
Population 65+19.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.2% (12.9–29.5%) n=90
Median age44.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.8 yr (33.4–51.3) n=90
Median household income$77,768$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,346 ($62,869–$124,659) n=83
Median home value$714,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$811,050 ($388,170–$1,090,410) n=82
Median gross rent$1,824$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,820 ($1,216–$2,442) n=80
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.9 yr ± 0.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.0 yr (78.3–85.4) n=84

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.70 years of 82.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured