Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

07631

in Englewood, New JerseyPopulation 29,638

62.64/ 100

Ranked #3,161 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.9%)

Ranked #315 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranked #530 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Physician access

6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

11 ppb

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

US98th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.72 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

45.6%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.17 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

95.8%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

95.8%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

5.5%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.0%

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Englewood, New Jersey (ZIP 07631) ranks in the top 9.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,161st) and the bottom 46% of New Jersey (315th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: physicians lands in the top 0.8% nationally, and dental providers registers in the top 1.5% nationally. Outpatient sits in the top 3.8% nationally, and mental-health providers rests in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled hearing disability is in the bottom 6.4% nationally. On the other hand, lead in tap water stands in the top 2.0% nationally, housing-cost burden settles in the top 5.2% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water lies in the top 6.0% nationally. PFOS in drinking water resides in the top 6.3% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure lands in the top 6.7% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, physicians runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 07024, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 22.2; chronic-disease standing 85.0 — 63 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,680 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.4%18.4–22.4
High blood pressure among adults35.0%32.3–37.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.3%5.7–6.9
Current asthma among adults8.8%7.8–9.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Depression among adults13.5%11.7–15.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%36.8–42.7
Obesity among adults30.1%26.3–34.1
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.4%8.4–12.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.6%11.9–15.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.1%74.6–79.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.0%76.4–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults89.9%88.5–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.4%61.3–69.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.1%62.0–67.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.1%70.0–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%12.7–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.6%8.3–10.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.6%22.8–28.7
Short sleep duration among adults42.0%37.8–46.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.3%16.5–20.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.8%13.3–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults11.6%10.4–12.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.2%10.0–12.6
Any disability among adults24.4%21.9–27.1
Hearing disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.6
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Mobility disability among adults12.0%10.7–13.4
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.0
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.9–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.5%24.4–30.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.2%15.0–19.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.4%9.0–12.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.6%13.7–17.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Loneliness among adults35.5%31.8–39.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.6–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–649.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)8.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)7.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle8.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription92.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)45.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate54.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population36.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households46.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+18.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age41.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$102,571$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$544,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$1,977$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.5 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured