ZIP code
96744
in Kaneohe, HawaiiPopulation 57,620
62.28/ 100
Ranked #3,352 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.5%)
Ranked #19 of 92 Hawaii ZIPs (top 21%)
Ranked #15 of 33 Urban Honolulu, HI ZIPs (top 45%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Short sleep
46.7%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST74thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the top 4.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST48thUS96thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Lead in tap water
0 ppb
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
US1stDefinition & source ›
The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.
Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.
Full methodology ›Median household income
$131,653
in the top 6.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.
Full methodology ›Obesity
26.3%
in the bottom 7.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST49thUS8thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Transit access
4.6 per 1,000 residents
in the top 5.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST84thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
12.2 per million
in the bottom 5.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST61stUS6thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
7.7%
in the top 7.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST52ndUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Loud transportation noise
1.8%
in the top 8.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST84thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.
Full methodology ›Park land
13.7%
in the top 9.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST85thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite measure, Kaneohe, Hawaii (ZIP 96744) sits in the top 10.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,352nd) and the top 21% of Hawaii (19th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: lead in tap water sits at the national minimum, household income registers in the top 6.7% nationally, and modeled obesity lands in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Transit resides in the top 5.8% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and park land settles in the top 9.4% nationally. Working the other way, modeled short sleep stands in the top 1.5% nationally, and disaster risk is in the top 4.1% nationally. Crowded housing rests in the top 7.1% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 8.9% nationally.
Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. ZIP 96701, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 81%
22%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 77%
17%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 93%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 81%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 95%
9%
Disability
healthier than 73%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 90%
6%
Holding it back
Risk Behavior
healthier than 30%
11%
No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
96701
Hawaiishares a border
Score 64.24
Closest healthier
96734
Hawaiishares a border
Score 65.32
Similar health profile
10923
New York98% similar profile
Score 60.24
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 24.4% | 22.1–26.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 32.7% | 29.9–35.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.4% | 6.8–8.0 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.2% | 9.2–11.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 6.1% | 5.6–6.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.1% | 4.5–5.6 |
| Depression among adults | 16.1% | 14.0–18.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 12.1% | 10.8–13.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 37.2% | 33.9–40.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 26.3% | 22.0–30.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.7% | 3.4–3.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 6.2% | 5.0–7.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 4.7% | 4.1–5.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 78.3% | 75.8–80.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.3% | 76.5–81.8 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 84.6% | 83.0–86.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 68.6% | 65.0–72.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 73.6% | 70.9–76.2 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 79.5% | 74.6–83.8 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 17.7% | 15.6–20.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 9.6% | 8.4–10.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 22.2% | 19.2–25.1 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 46.7% | 42.1–51.5 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 17.6% | 16.0–19.3 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.3% | 12.9–15.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.1% | 11.0–13.2 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 12.1% | 10.9–13.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 28.9% | 26.0–31.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.2% | 6.5–8.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.8% | 6.2–7.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 13.4% | 12.1–14.8 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.2% | 3.0–3.5 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.9% | 4.6–5.3 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 29.0% | 26.1–32.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 14.9% | 13.4–16.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 9.9% | 8.6–11.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.9% | 8.7–11.1 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 6.6% | 5.9–7.3 |
| Loneliness among adults | 31.5% | 28.3–34.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.2% | 4.5–5.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | HI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 8.3% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (5.2–19.8%) n=86 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 2.4% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 5.0% (1.1–10.4%) n=86 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 4.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.2% (1.5–11.7%) n=90 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 40.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.6% (16.3–48.7%) n=90 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 4.1% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.5% (1.9–11.7%) n=89 |
| Households without a vehicle | 4.2% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.1% (0.0–11.0%) n=86 |
| Broadband subscription | 94.8% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 92.5% (84.3–96.6%) n=86 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 31.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 35.3% (21.1–49.6%) n=86 |
| Homeownership rate | 77.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 68.1% (46.6–84.7%) n=86 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 7.7% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 7.6% (3.1–16.2%) n=86 |
| Foreign-born population | 6.9% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 12.5% (5.0–27.3%) n=90 |
| Single-parent households | 56.1% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.6% (41.2–64.3%) n=86 |
| Population 65+ | 24.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.2% (12.9–29.5%) n=90 |
| Median age | 43.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.8 yr (33.4–51.3) n=90 |
| Median household income | $131,653 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,346 ($62,869–$124,659) n=83 |
| Median home value | $1,039,900 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $811,050 ($388,170–$1,090,410) n=82 |
| Median gross rent | $2,370 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,820 ($1,216–$2,442) n=80 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | HI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 80.9 yr ± 0.58 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 81.0 yr (78.3–85.4) n=84 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.58 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured