Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

96701

in Aiea, HawaiiPopulation 39,200

64.24/ 100

Ranked #2,323 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 7.3%)

Ranked #11 of 92 Hawaii ZIPs (top 12.0%)

Ranked #9 of 33 Urban Honolulu, HI ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

46.7%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.4%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST46th
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

5.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.5%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

2.1%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.8%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

9.0%

in the top 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Aiea, Hawaii (ZIP 96701) stands in the top 7.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,323rd) and the top 12.0% of Hawaii (11th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled obesity registers in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and lead in tap water lies at the national minimum. Transit is in the top 4.9% nationally. Distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled short sleep lies in the top 1.5% nationally, modeled disaster risk is in the top 4.5% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water registers at the national maximum. Modeled loud transportation noise lies in the top 5.1% nationally, slow internet speeds is in the top 5.6% nationally, and crowded housing registers in the top 8.8% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, slow internet speeds runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. ZIP 96860, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 94%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.7 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $111,173 predicts 80.5 years — 1.2 years above.

    Ranked #1,407 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.3%20.0–24.6
High blood pressure among adults32.7%29.7–35.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.2%5.7–6.7
Current asthma among adults9.0%8.0–9.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.4–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Depression among adults13.7%11.8–15.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.7–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.4%35.1–41.6
Obesity among adults23.4%19.5–27.5
Stroke among adults3.5%3.3–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.7%5.4–8.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.9%4.2–5.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.6–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%76.7–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults84.4%82.7–85.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.9%63.2–70.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.0%70.2–75.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.4%74.5–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%13.8–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.4%8.2–10.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.9%20.8–27.1
Short sleep duration among adults46.7%42.0–51.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.7%16.0–19.4
Frequent mental distress among adults13.1%11.8–14.3
Frequent physical distress among adults11.4%10.3–12.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.1%10.0–12.3
Any disability among adults27.4%24.6–30.2
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.7–6.9
Mobility disability among adults12.9%11.6–14.2
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.6–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.2%28.2–34.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.1%14.6–17.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.3%9.0–11.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.7–10.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Loneliness among adults31.8%28.6–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.4–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (5.2–19.8%) n=86
Uninsured 18–645.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (1.1–10.4%) n=86
No HS diploma (25+)6.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.2% (1.5–11.7%) n=90
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.6% (16.3–48.7%) n=90
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (1.9–11.7%) n=89
Households without a vehicle5.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.0%) n=86
Broadband subscription93.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (84.3–96.6%) n=86
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32235.3% (21.1–49.6%) n=86
Homeownership rate69.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32268.1% (46.6–84.7%) n=86
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3227.6% (3.1–16.2%) n=86
Foreign-born population17.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55312.5% (5.0–27.3%) n=90
Single-parent households56.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.6% (41.2–64.3%) n=86
Population 65+25.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.2% (12.9–29.5%) n=90
Median age45.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.8 yr (33.4–51.3) n=90
Median household income$111,173$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,346 ($62,869–$124,659) n=83
Median home value$941,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$811,050 ($388,170–$1,090,410) n=82
Median gross rent$1,976$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,820 ($1,216–$2,442) n=80
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 0.4978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.0 yr (78.3–85.4) n=84

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.49 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured