Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

96754

in Kilauea, HawaiiPopulation 4,272

55.00/ 100

Ranked #9,448 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #60 of 92 Hawaii ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

94.5 mi

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST52nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

9.8%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

99.6%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

27.2%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST30th
US91st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

29.2%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

5.9 mi

in the top 34% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US66th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

Kilauea, Hawaii (ZIP 96754) ranks in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,448th) and the bottom 35% of Hawaii (60th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The bright spots in the data define much of the story here: modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 4.0% nationally, and home broadband subscription sits in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled obesity resides in the bottom 9.6% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 13.5% nationally. On the other side, crowded housing sits in the top 4.8% nationally, modeled disaster risk resides in the top 8.6% nationally, and modeled short sleep stands in the top 12.7% nationally. Modeled binge drinking sits in the top 12.7% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 96722, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

22%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

17%

Environmental HazardPartial

in the top 0.3%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

9%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

6%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.9%25.0–30.8
High blood pressure among adults33.1%29.9–36.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.3–8.8
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.3–8.3
Depression among adults19.5%16.7–22.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%9.9–12.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.7%32.2–39.3
Obesity among adults27.2%22.3–32.4
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.1%7.4–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.7–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.9%70.6–77.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.0%70.4–77.4
Cholesterol screening among adults81.2%79.0–83.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.0%59.5–68.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.9%65.8–71.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.1%65.3–78.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.8%16.0–21.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.6%12.4–16.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.5%18.2–24.9
Short sleep duration among adults41.0%36.1–46.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.5%17.1–22.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.7–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.7–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%12.9–16.3
Any disability among adults28.6%25.2–32.2
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.4–8.1
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.3
Mobility disability among adults13.8%12.0–15.7
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.1%21.9–28.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.5%16.0–21.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.6%14.1–19.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.9–13.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.6–9.8
Loneliness among adults29.2%25.5–32.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (5.2–19.8%) n=86
Uninsured 18–6412.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (1.1–10.4%) n=86
No HS diploma (25+)9.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.2% (1.5–11.7%) n=90
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.6% (16.3–48.7%) n=90
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (1.9–11.7%) n=89
Households without a vehicle1.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.0%) n=86
Broadband subscription99.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (84.3–96.6%) n=86
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32235.3% (21.1–49.6%) n=86
Homeownership rate81.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32268.1% (46.6–84.7%) n=86
Crowded housing (>1 per room)9.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3227.6% (3.1–16.2%) n=86
Foreign-born population8.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55312.5% (5.0–27.3%) n=90
Single-parent households50.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.6% (41.2–64.3%) n=86
Population 65+22.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.2% (12.9–29.5%) n=90
Median age44.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.8 yr (33.4–51.3) n=90
Median household income$90,353$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,346 ($62,869–$124,659) n=83
Median home value$1,227,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$811,050 ($388,170–$1,090,410) n=82
Median gross rent$1,646$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,820 ($1,216–$2,442) n=80
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.3 yr ± 2.0678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.0 yr (78.3–85.4) n=84

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.06 years of 85.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured