Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

96765

in Lawai, HawaiiPopulation 513

59.87/ 100

Ranked #4,951 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranked #32 of 92 Hawaii ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Unemployment rate

29.3%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.8%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

49.5%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

97 mi

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST54th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.9%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

7.3 mi

in the top 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

Lawai, Hawaii (ZIP 96765), by its composite score, sits in the top 15% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,951st) and the top 35% of Hawaii (32nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled obesity sits in the bottom 4.0% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 3.8% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss resides in the bottom 5.3% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 6.2% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Poverty stands in the bottom 9.5% nationally. Pulling the other way, unemployment registers in the top 0.9% nationally, housing-cost burden settles in the top 3.3% nationally, and modeled short sleep sits in the top 10.5% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 96741, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Environmental HazardPartial

in the top 0.4%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.0%22.4–27.8
High blood pressure among adults30.5%27.3–33.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.3%6.6–8.0
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.4%4.7–6.3
Depression among adults17.7%15.2–20.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.1–12.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.8%31.3–38.3
Obesity among adults23.8%19.5–28.5
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.7%6.2–9.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.9%4.8–7.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.3%70.0–76.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.1%70.6–77.5
Cholesterol screening among adults83.0%80.9–84.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.5%58.0–66.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.9%67.8–73.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.6%65.8–78.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.9%16.2–21.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.6%9.8–13.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.1%16.1–22.4
Short sleep duration among adults41.6%36.5–46.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.5%14.3–19.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.3–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.6%11.2–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.3–14.6
Any disability among adults25.7%22.6–29.2
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.3
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.1–8.0
Mobility disability among adults11.8%10.3–13.7
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.0%22.6–29.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.9%12.4–17.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.5–14.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.4–11.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.3–8.4
Loneliness among adults29.3%25.7–33.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.3–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (5.2–19.8%) n=86
Uninsured 18–642.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (1.1–10.4%) n=86
No HS diploma (25+)1.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.2% (1.5–11.7%) n=90
Bachelor's or higher (25+)34.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.6% (16.3–48.7%) n=90
Unemployment rate (16+)29.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (1.9–11.7%) n=89
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.0%) n=86
Broadband subscription95.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (84.3–96.6%) n=86
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)49.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32235.3% (21.1–49.6%) n=86
Homeownership rate64.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32268.1% (46.6–84.7%) n=86
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3227.6% (3.1–16.2%) n=86
Foreign-born population4.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55312.5% (5.0–27.3%) n=90
Single-parent households58.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.6% (41.2–64.3%) n=86
Population 65+25.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.2% (12.9–29.5%) n=90
Median age34.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.8 yr (33.4–51.3) n=90
Median household income$102,679$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,346 ($62,869–$124,659) n=83
Median home value$864,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$811,050 ($388,170–$1,090,410) n=82
Median gross rent$1,875$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,820 ($1,216–$2,442) n=80
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.0 yr ± 1.3278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.0 yr (78.3–85.4) n=84

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.32 years of 83.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured