Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14441

in Dresden, New YorkPopulation 308

54.53/ 100

Ranked #10,034 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #1,089 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US4th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

99.1%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19%

in the top 11.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

23.1%

in the top 13.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

The read

Dresden, New York (ZIP 14441), by its overall standing, sits in the top 31% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,034th) and the bottom 37% of New York (1,089th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled expected annual loss registers in the bottom 2.4% nationally, modeled disaster risk stands in the bottom 4.4% nationally, and home broadband subscription lands in the top 5.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Crowded housing resides at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Unemployment rests in the bottom 17% nationally, and walkability lies in the top 18% nationally. By contrast, modeled binge drinking sits in the top 11.2% nationally, and poverty settles in the top 13.2% nationally. Modeled arsenic registers in the top 18% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 14456, about 4.2 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.0%23.9–30.4
High blood pressure among adults33.5%29.5–37.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.6–10.5
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.3–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.3–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.2–9.5
Depression among adults19.3%16.3–22.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%8.9–12.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%32.7–41.0
Obesity among adults33.2%25.8–40.7
Stroke among adults3.7%3.1–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.0%9.8–14.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%6.8–12.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.8%74.2–79.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%75.2–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.0–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.8%65.0–74.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.2%54.4–61.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%68.5–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.0%15.8–22.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.0%11.0–17.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.8%20.8–31.1
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%30.6–44.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.7%15.2–22.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%13.8–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.9%11.8–16.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%11.5–16.3
Any disability among adults30.2%25.3–35.2
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.3–8.5
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.0–10.0
Mobility disability among adults14.2%11.4–17.0
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.2–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.2–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.6%20.5–29.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.9%11.2–18.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.7%9.7–15.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%9.7–15.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.6–9.7
Loneliness among adults32.7%27.4–38.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.7–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–644.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)7.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)0.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle0.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription99.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate80.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population2.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households69.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+22.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age43.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$70,833$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$123,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$718$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 0.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured