ZIP code
93628
in Hume, CaliforniaPopulation 351
49.57/ 100
Ranked #16,845 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)
Ranked #1,097 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 36%)
Ranked #22 of 65 Fresno, CA ZIPs (top 34%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Park land
96%
in the top 0.09% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
24%
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance
6.0%
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
34 mi
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
27.8 mi
in the top 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Walkability
0.95 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 2.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST2ndUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
29.3%
in the bottom 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
21.1 mi
in the top 4.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST96thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
26.7%
in the bottom 4.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite health measure, Hume, California (ZIP 93628) ranks in the bottom 47% nationally (16,845th) and the bottom 36% of California (1,097th).
Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: homeownership lies at the national minimum, and home broadband subscription lands in the bottom 0.5% nationally. Modeled fine-particle sits in the top 0.8% nationally, and distance to an emergency room is in the top 1.5% nationally. Distance to a nursing home settles in the top 1.9% nationally, and walkability resides in the bottom 2.5% nationally. On the better side, park land registers in the top 0.09% nationally, modeled high cholesterol rests in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 4.4% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lies in the bottom 4.4% nationally.
Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Close by, ZIP 93641, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Fresno, CA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 89%
21%
Disability
healthier than 72%
7%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 42%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 55%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 53%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 16%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 13%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 7%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 3%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 69%
21%
Disability
healthier than 67%
7%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 44%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 46%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 41%
5%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 34%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 31%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 2%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 2%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 95%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 72%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 92%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 61%
13%
Disability
healthier than 92%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 89%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 53%
11%
Holding it back
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 2%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
93641
Californiashares a border
Score 49.73
Closest healthier
93603
Californiaabout 2.6 mi away
Score 52.06
Similar health profile
55070
Minnesota92% similar profile
Score 53.54
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 20.3% | 17.9–23.0 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 26.7% | 23.6–30.1 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 6.2% | 5.6–6.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.2% | 9.8–12.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 4.6% | 3.9–5.5 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.6% | 4.4–7.0 |
| Depression among adults | 27.5% | 24.1–31.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 7.7% | 6.5–9.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 29.3% | 26.1–32.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 35.3% | 30.0–41.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.5% | 2.1–3.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 14.5% | 11.9–17.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.5% | 4.6–9.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 66.0% | 62.2–69.9 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 68.7% | 64.5–72.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 82.6% | 79.4–85.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 60.8% | 56.3–65.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 61.7% | 58.5–65.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 75.3% | 68.7–81.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 19.4% | 16.3–22.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 14.0% | 10.8–17.7 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 20.6% | 16.8–25.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 34.1% | 29.5–39.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 19.2% | 15.8–23.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 21.0% | 18.3–24.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.8% | 10.9–15.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.7% | 13.8–20.2 |
| Any disability among adults | 30.3% | 25.9–35.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 5.0% | 4.3–5.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.4% | 6.9–10.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 11.3% | 9.3–13.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.3% | 2.7–4.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.1% | 3.4–5.0 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.2% | 21.0–29.7 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 14.0% | 10.2–18.5 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 13.6% | 9.9–18.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.2% | 9.5–15.4 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.1% | 6.5–10.2 |
| Loneliness among adults | 36.6% | 31.9–41.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 6.8% | 5.4–8.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 6.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 8.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 19.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | 24.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 11.3% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | 0.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | 6.8% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | 0.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | 26.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | $26,274 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | $233 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 72.6 yr ± 2.72 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.72 years of 72.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured