ZIP code
43721
in Brownsville, OhioPopulation 196
50.70/ 100
Ranked #15,281 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)
Ranked #383 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 33%)
Ranked #53 of 127 Columbus, OH ZIPs (top 42%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Unemployment rate
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
45.6%
in the bottom 1.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
52.8%
in the bottom 3.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 2.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 3.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST13thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
4.7%
in the bottom 4.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
4.6%
in the bottom 6.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›The read
In overall standing, Brownsville, Ohio (ZIP 43721) comes out in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,281st) and the top 33% of Ohio (383rd).
The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: housing-cost burden stands at the national minimum, poverty lands at the national minimum, and modeled expected annual loss is in the bottom 2.4% nationally. Homeownership resides at the national maximum, modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and modeled hearing disability lies in the bottom 4.5% nationally. Households without a vehicle sits at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Set against that, unemployment settles at the national maximum, and home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Modeled colon screening stands in the bottom 3.3% nationally.
Relative to the ZIPs around it, unemployment runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 43076, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Columbus, OH metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 82%
21%
Disability
healthier than 83%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 65%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 51%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 46%
14%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 18%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 28%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 9%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 14%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 95%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 74%
14%
Disability
healthier than 87%
7%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 58%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 53%
11%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 8%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 14%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 36%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 2%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 79%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 82%
14%
Disability
healthier than 70%
7%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 49%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 46%
11%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 8%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 16%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 39%
5%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.9%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
43076
Ohioshares a border
Score 51.97
Closest healthier
43740
Ohioabout 1.5 mi away
Score 53.01
Similar health profile
55070
Minnesota95% similar profile
Score 53.54
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 23.5% | 20.6–26.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 28.6% | 25.2–32.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 6.4% | 5.7–7.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.1% | 9.8–12.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 4.6% | 3.9–5.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 6.3% | 5.0–7.6 |
| Depression among adults | 28.5% | 24.8–32.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 9.7% | 8.2–11.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 31.7% | 28.2–35.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 37.3% | 31.1–43.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.4% | 2.0–2.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 17.1% | 13.8–20.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 7.2% | 5.2–9.7 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 71.6% | 68.4–75.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 75.0% | 71.2–78.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 81.8% | 78.5–84.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 52.8% | 48.1–57.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 61.5% | 58.0–64.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 78.0% | 71.1–83.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 19.1% | 16.0–22.7 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 16.2% | 12.3–20.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 21.8% | 17.1–26.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.7% | 33.3–44.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 16.0% | 12.9–19.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 19.6% | 16.7–22.6 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.4% | 10.4–14.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.3% | 12.5–18.2 |
| Any disability among adults | 26.7% | 22.1–31.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.7% | 4.0–5.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.3% | 5.9–8.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 9.9% | 8.0–12.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.9% | 2.4–3.5 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.7% | 3.0–4.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 21.3% | 17.5–25.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.8% | 8.5–15.3 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 9.1% | 6.5–11.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.2% | 7.8–12.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.1% | 5.6–8.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 36.8% | 31.5–42.5 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.1% | 5.6–8.5 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 100.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177 |
| Broadband subscription | 45.6% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180 |
| Single-parent households | 0.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 53.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168 |
| Population 65+ | 32.1% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180 |
| Median age | 42.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 82.1 yr ± 2.05 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.05 years of 82.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured