Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

90706

in Bellflower, CaliforniaPopulation 76,819

49.57/ 100

Ranked #16,844 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #1,096 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #292 of 371 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

42.9%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

52.4%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST15th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

17.6%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

230 intersections/sq mi

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

3.0%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

45.8%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

39.3%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST16th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

Bellflower, California (ZIP 90706) ranks in the bottom 47% nationally (16,844th) and the bottom 36% of California (1,096th).

continue reading

The weightiest signals in the profile are worth naming up front: modeled loneliness is in the top 1.3% nationally, and expected annual loss registers in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled colon screening lies in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and crowded housing is in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled fine-particle registers in the top 2.2% nationally, air-toxics cancer risk lies in the top 4.5% nationally, and tree cover is at the national minimum. Housing-cost burden registers in the top 5.0% nationally, and homeownership lies in the bottom 5.1% nationally. More positively, walkability is in the top 1.8% nationally.

Against its neighbors, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 90242, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 0.9 (bottom 1%); chronic-disease standing 89.2 — 88 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,772 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 78.5 ± 1.0 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults18.8%17.4–20.4
High blood pressure among adults29.8%27.8–31.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.7%4.3–5.2
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.6–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.0%4.6–5.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.0%4.5–5.4
Depression among adults19.4%17.5–21.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.7–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%33.3–37.7
Obesity among adults28.7%25.9–31.6
Stroke among adults3.2%3.0–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.7%9.7–13.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.3%12.7–15.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.8%67.2–72.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.5%68.0–72.9
Cholesterol screening among adults83.0%81.4–84.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years52.4%48.9–55.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.9%54.3–59.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.4%69.2–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%13.4–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%11.1–13.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.9%26.5–31.3
Short sleep duration among adults38.4%35.4–41.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.8%24.9–28.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%16.3–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.8–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.9–18.9
Any disability among adults33.6%31.3–36.0
Hearing disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.8–10.5
Mobility disability among adults15.3%14.0–16.7
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.5–5.3
Vision disability among adults7.3%6.7–7.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults34.1%31.5–36.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.9%23.9–28.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.9%21.0–25.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.7%19.9–23.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.5%11.4–13.8
Loneliness among adults42.9%40.2–45.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6412.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)20.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)7.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle6.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription91.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)45.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate39.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)17.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population30.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households38.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+12.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age36.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$78,722$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$705,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,830$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.5 yr ± 0.4978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.49 years of 78.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured