Skip to main content
ZipVitals

How the Fresno, CA metro's ZIP codes measure up on health

The ZipVitals Score across the Fresno, CA metro area — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up by resident population.

Data release 202665 of 66 ZIP codes scored · 1.2M residents represented

Score snapshot

43.50Metro-wide ZipVitals Scorepopulation-weighted average of its ZIP codes
42.05Median scoremiddle of 65 scored ZIPs
61.89Highest score93730 · Fresno
24.24Lowest score93624 · Five Points
37.65Spreadpoints between highest & lowest ZIP

People & national context

#343Among 386 metrosby population-weighted average
82%Residents in below-average ZIPs0.96M of 1.2M, in ZIPs scoring under the national average (53.48)
0.99MResidents in the top 50 ZIPs84% of the metro
0.92MResidents in the bottom 50 ZIPs78% of the metro
0ZIPs in the national top 100

The Fresno, CA metro's ZIP codes, ranked

Highest-scoring

Top 50 of 65
  1. 3,57793730in Fresno · 14,263 residents61.89
  2. 4,51293720in Fresno · 50,089 residents60.46
  3. 4,72993619in Clovis · 55,610 residents60.18
  4. 6,42793611in Clovis · 46,624 residents57.97
  5. 7,25293711in Fresno · 39,245 residents57.02
  6. 7,77793626in Friant · 3,304 residents56.49
  7. 10,82393651in Prather · 1,489 residents53.90
  8. 11,15393669in Wishon · 196 residents53.65
  9. 12,78393723in Fresno · 14,726 residents52.48
  10. 12,80693614in Coarsegold · 11,445 residents52.47
  11. 13,41493667in Tollhouse · 2,218 residents52.03
  12. 13,74093604in Bass Lake · 710 residents51.77
  13. 14,72093621in Dunlap · 441 residents51.08
  14. 14,89993636in Madera · 15,294 residents50.96
  15. 14,97793664in Shaver Lake · 345 residents50.91
  16. 15,07793645in O Neals · 905 residents50.85
  17. 15,17993602in Auberry · 3,330 residents50.77
  18. 15,67293643in North Fork · 3,041 residents50.42
  19. 16,47993644in Oakhurst · 7,614 residents49.83
  20. 16,55393727in Fresno · 84,107 residents49.77
  21. 16,62293641in Miramonte · 466 residents49.73
  22. 16,84593628in Hume · 351 residents49.57
  23. 16,89093675in Yokuts · 3,374 residents49.54
  24. 18,76893631in Kingsburg · 17,583 residents48.14
  25. 19,25493722in Fresno · 86,110 residents47.75
  26. 19,40793704in Fresno · 28,932 residents47.63
  27. 20,31593605in Big Creek · 69 residents46.87
  28. 20,70993653in Raymond · 1,260 residents46.54
  29. 21,39793657in Sanger · 36,205 residents45.96
  30. 21,40393710in Fresno · 31,669 residents45.95
  31. 22,68493612in Clovis · 37,755 residents44.74
  32. 24,23193625in Fowler · 8,778 residents43.16
  33. 25,17493616in Del Rey · 2,402 residents42.05
  34. 25,30393662in Selma · 29,419 residents41.90
  35. 25,53093650in Fresno · 3,333 residents41.65
  36. 25,53993725in Fresno · 24,575 residents41.64
  37. 25,61893210in Coalinga · 18,491 residents41.55
  38. 26,55493637in Madera · 43,785 residents40.29
  39. 26,69593242in Laton · 2,904 residents40.09
  40. 27,31593609in Caruthers · 4,740 residents39.12
  41. 27,43493654in Reedley · 31,876 residents38.95
  42. 27,96393728in Fresno · 18,313 residents38.07
  43. 28,19793726in Fresno · 44,527 residents37.68
  44. 28,37493606in Biola · 988 residents37.32
  45. 28,45393705in Fresno · 38,888 residents37.15
  46. 28,52393656in Riverdale · 7,172 residents37.01
  47. 28,88393630in Kerman · 21,284 residents36.24
  48. 29,20293610in Chowchilla · 23,520 residents35.47
  49. 30,06693648in Parlier · 15,184 residents32.92
  50. 30,43593638in Madera · 50,571 residents31.48
Open the full Fresno, CA metro ranking →One page, all 65 scored ZIPs — sortable by score, residents, or place

Where each domain sits inside this metro

The Score above is one number for the whole Fresno, CA metro. Nine domains make it up, and they are not spread the same way across the people who live here. Each row divides this metro's ZIP codes into fifths by how they stand against each other on that domain, then counts who lives at each end. If a domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents, every row would read about 20%.

The highest-standing fifth

13 of 65 ZIPs

Share of the metro's residents living in the fifth of its ZIP codes that stand highest on each domain.

Chronic Disease Burden41%484,562 people

Standing highest: 93619 Clovis93720 Fresno93730 Fresno

Healthcare Access38%445,297 people

6 ZIP codes tie at this end: 93210 Coalinga93637 Madera93703 Fresno93710 Fresno93720 Fresno93721 Fresno

Mental Health28%325,911 people

Standing highest: 93604 Bass Lake93711 Fresno93730 Fresno

Disability20%232,350 people

Standing highest: 93619 Clovis93720 Fresno93730 Fresno

Risk Behavior20%229,691 people

Standing highest: 93604 Bass Lake93720 Fresno93730 Fresno

Social Need / SDOH19%222,148 people

Standing highest: 93626 Friant93720 Fresno93730 Fresno

Preventive Care12%137,289 people

Standing highest: 93604 Bass Lake93614 Coarsegold93664 Shaver Lake

Environmental Hazard5%59,448 people

Standing highest: 93210 Coalinga93234 Huron93640 Mendota

Climate / Disaster Risk3%32,287 people

Standing highest: 93604 Bass Lake93605 Big Creek93664 Shaver Lake

Each fifth is about 13 of this metro’s 65 compared ZIP codes, and the shares are out of 1,171,986 residents. A ZIP code is compared here only if it carries a resident count to weight it by and enough measured data on that domain — the rest are left out of that domain’s fifths rather than filled in from a coarser geography, which is why this count can sit just below the metro’s scored total.

The mark shows 20% — where a row would sit if that domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents.

Each ZIP code is compared with the other ZIP codes in this metro that are measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.

Why this matters

The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The Fresno, CA figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe the metro's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the metro.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.