Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

93235

in Ivanhoe, CaliforniaPopulation 4,678

32.41/ 100

Ranked #30,200 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 5.9%)

Ranked #1,657 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 3.7%)

Ranked #21 of 31 Visalia, CA ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Nitrate in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

27.1%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

47.1%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

9.3%

in the top 0.10% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

12.4%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

38.9%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

27%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

50 per million

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

111.7 days/year

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

23.1%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Ivanhoe, California (ZIP 93235) sits in the bottom 5.9% nationally (30,200th) and the bottom 3.7% of California (1,657th).

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: modeled nitrate rests at the national maximum, uninsured settles in the top 1.8% nationally, and colon screening lands in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Modeled fine-particle rests in the top 0.10% nationally, vision disability settles in the top 1.8% nationally, and fair or poor health lands in the top 0.9% nationally. Crowded housing rests in the top 0.7% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lands in the top 1.0% nationally, and cognitive disability rests in the top 2.3% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, crowded housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 93292, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Visalia, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 1%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 1.7 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 61.8 — 60 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,428 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.7%18.0–23.4
High blood pressure among adults33.3%29.4–37.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Current asthma among adults10.2%8.9–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.2–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%5.9–8.0
Depression among adults22.1%18.7–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.5%14.3–18.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.6%31.5–39.7
Obesity among adults38.5%31.4–45.9
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.0%18.2–26.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years27.1%21.5–32.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure68.6%65.1–71.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults66.4%61.8–71.0
Cholesterol screening among adults77.9%74.5–81.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years47.1%41.8–52.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults44.5%40.8–48.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.3%57.7–74.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.0–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.6%13.7–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults41.5%35.3–47.3
Short sleep duration among adults36.3%30.5–42.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults38.9%33.6–43.8
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%17.6–22.8
Frequent physical distress among adults19.9%17.2–22.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.1%19.7–26.3
Any disability among adults43.4%37.8–48.7
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.4
Independent living disability among adults13.5%11.5–15.5
Mobility disability among adults21.9%18.9–25.0
Self-care disability among adults7.6%6.4–8.7
Vision disability among adults12.4%10.7–14.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.7%27.2–36.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults40.2%33.9–46.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults38.1%32.3–43.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults30.3%25.8–34.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults19.3%16.3–22.4
Loneliness among adults39.0%33.6–44.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.8%13.5–18.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6424.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)48.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription91.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate64.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)27.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population37.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households48.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+11.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age34.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$52,083$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$229,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$876$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.5 yr ± 2.2878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.28 years of 82.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured