Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

93286

in Woodlake, CaliforniaPopulation 10,548

34.77/ 100

Ranked #29,469 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.1%)

Ranked #1,615 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 6.1%)

Ranked #19 of 31 Visalia, CA ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

8.1%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

23.7%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

11.5%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

36.3%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

51.1%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

47.6%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

49.2 per million

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

98.8 days/year

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.4%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

14.1%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Woodlake, California (ZIP 93286) comes out in the bottom 8.1% nationally (29,469th) and the bottom 6.1% of California (1,615th).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled fine-particle lies in the top 0.3% nationally, uninsured sits in the top 2.7% nationally, and vision disability settles in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health registers in the top 1.9% nationally, colon screening stands in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and nitrate lands in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the top 1.1% nationally, and extreme heat resides in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled self-care disability rests in the top 4.4% nationally, and crowded housing lies in the top 2.5% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 93221, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Visalia, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 4.2 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 57.1 — 53 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,682 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 49.2 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 79.5 ± 2.6 years.

    Ranked #209 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.1%19.4–24.9
High blood pressure among adults34.2%30.4–38.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.6–8.4
Depression among adults22.3%19.1–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.2%14.2–18.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.3%32.4–40.4
Obesity among adults37.5%30.6–44.9
Stroke among adults4.2%3.9–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.1%16.7–23.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years23.7%19.7–28.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.2%66.7–73.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults67.9%63.5–72.2
Cholesterol screening among adults79.9%77.2–82.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years51.1%45.9–56.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.9%45.4–52.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.8%63.8–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.2–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.1%13.8–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.4%33.3–43.7
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%29.4–41.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults36.3%32.4–40.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.7%17.4–22.0
Frequent physical distress among adults19.3%17.1–21.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.6%19.2–24.3
Any disability among adults41.8%37.1–46.6
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
Independent living disability among adults13.0%11.5–14.6
Mobility disability among adults21.6%18.9–24.3
Self-care disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.2
Vision disability among adults11.5%10.3–12.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.2%26.3–34.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.3%31.0–40.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults34.1%30.1–38.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.9%23.5–30.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.4%15.3–19.7
Loneliness among adults37.6%32.6–42.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.6–16.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate25.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6419.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)38.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)8.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle6.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription88.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate57.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)14.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population27.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households42.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+12.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age33.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$47,574$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$339,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$982$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.4 yr ± 1.3278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.32 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured