Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

93244

in Lemon Cove, CaliforniaPopulation 117

49.48/ 100

Ranked #16,968 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #1,104 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #3 of 31 Visalia, CA ZIPs (top 9.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

7.9%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

7.8%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

50 per million

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

36.4%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

32.8%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

16.1%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

60.1 days/year

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Lemon Cove, California (ZIP 93244) comes out in the bottom 47% nationally (16,968th) and the bottom 36% of California (1,104th).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled fine-particle settles in the top 0.3% nationally, loud transportation noise registers in the top 0.5% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk stands in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled nitrate lands in the top 1.3% nationally, households without a vehicle is in the top 2.1% nationally, and modeled transportation noise resides in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat rests in the top 7.4% nationally. On the brighter side, homeownership lies at the national maximum, and home broadband subscription sits at the national maximum. Modeled expected annual loss settles in the bottom 7.0% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, loud transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 93271, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Visalia, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.9%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.1%21.0–27.5
High blood pressure among adults32.3%28.4–36.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.7–9.5
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.4–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%4.9–7.0
Depression among adults24.5%20.8–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%9.1–12.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.2%32.1–40.5
Obesity among adults30.9%24.6–37.8
Stroke among adults3.2%2.8–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.8%7.0–10.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%5.7–9.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.4%69.8–76.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.9%68.7–76.7
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%85.7–89.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.6%58.5–68.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.6%65.3–71.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%66.3–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%13.7–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.3%9.2–13.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.3%18.3–26.6
Short sleep duration among adults30.0%24.8–35.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.8%16.8–23.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.2–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%11.9–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.1–16.4
Any disability among adults29.6%25.3–34.1
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.5
Independent living disability among adults8.0%6.8–9.4
Mobility disability among adults13.7%11.5–16.3
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%19.7–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.0%10.5–16.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.2–15.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.7–14.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.3–8.8
Loneliness among adults33.0%28.1–38.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.3–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)33.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle32.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population22.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households80.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+17.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age56.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$164,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 1.2278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.22 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured