Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

92310

in Fort Irwin, CaliforniaPopulation 8,419

52.41/ 100

Ranked #12,895 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #918 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #57 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

18.6%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

42.1%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

16.5%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

1.5%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

23.4%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

3.5%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

1.0%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

2.5%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

1.1%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Fort Irwin, California (ZIP 92310) lands in the top 40% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,895th) and the bottom 47% of California (918th).

continue reading

A number of measures mark what daily life looks like here: modeled colon screening lands in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and slow internet speeds sits at the national maximum. Modeled binge drinking is in the top 1.0% nationally, and homeownership settles in the bottom 0.9% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled high cholesterol resides in the bottom 0.9% nationally, high blood pressure registers in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and coronary heart disease rests in the bottom 0.8% nationally. Modeled diabetes stands in the bottom 0.9% nationally, stroke lies in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and hearing disability lands in the bottom 0.5% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 92342, about 40 miles away, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.7%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.6%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.5%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.7%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Disability

in the top 0.00%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.0 ± 3.5 years. A median household income of $76,107 predicts 79.0 years — 5.0 years below.

    Ranked #5,547 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults8.3%7.2–9.5
High blood pressure among adults16.5%14.4–18.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults1.7%1.5–1.9
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults1.5%1.4–1.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults2.3%2.0–2.7
Depression among adults23.9%20.9–26.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults3.5%3.0–4.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened18.6%16.3–20.8
Obesity among adults28.8%24.8–33.0
Stroke among adults1.0%0.9–1.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.6%9.3–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.2%7.4–11.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure36.1%32.4–39.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults60.4%56.4–64.4
Cholesterol screening among adults73.8%70.7–77.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years42.1%37.7–46.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.8%51.4–58.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.9%62.9–76.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults23.4%20.2–26.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.7%8.8–12.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.5%13.8–19.5
Short sleep duration among adults39.9%35.6–44.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.0%13.8–18.6
Frequent mental distress among adults22.6%20.0–25.3
Frequent physical distress among adults9.2%8.0–10.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.2%15.7–20.8
Any disability among adults24.7%21.4–28.3
Hearing disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.9
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.6–8.8
Mobility disability among adults4.7%4.0–5.5
Self-care disability among adults1.9%1.7–2.2
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.4%27.4–35.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.4%15.3–21.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.6%13.7–19.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.4%13.8–19.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.9–13.4
Loneliness among adults43.7%39.3–48.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.1–9.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–645.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)0.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)34.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)12.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription99.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)42.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate1.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population8.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households43.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age23.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$76,107$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,818$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.0 yr ± 1.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.78 years of 74.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured